Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Bit) - I~~ l~t~~~~~~II~j'lti <br /> ..........below..SO.%of.medlan...rncome.......... <br /> .......:.:<<<.:-:-:-:-:.:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:-:-:.:-:-:-:.:-,-:-:.:-:-:.:-:.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:.:-:-............................<-:..-:...:-.-:.....:-.......................-:-:-:.;.. <br />~ <br /> ........,.,.,.,. 500 1 00% <br /> 400 75 .95% <br /> ~L 300 1 00% <br /> 400 64% <br /> . 600 58.33% <br />11<.................. 1 00 <br /> 63.4301<> <br /> 1 00 50.45% <br /> ...,.,.......' ...:......'................... 400 75. 94% <br /> :....,.....,.. <br /> 200 54% <br /> :::::::: 300 79 .49% <br /> <br />TABLE B: UNSUITABLE AREAS BY CENSUS TRACT <br />AND BLOCK GROUPS -1990 CENSUS <br /> <br />Table B identifies census tract block groups in which more than 50% of all families have incomes at or below 50% <br />of the median income (low-income families). The data in Table B shows that these ten block groups are <br />unsuitable areas due to the number of low-income families. <br /> <br />C:\AAUSER\COUNCIL\DISPFIN9.CC <br />