My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
02-13-2017
>
02-13-17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2017 9:48:31 AM
Creation date
2/10/2017 9:48:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
2/13/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13.Brian Weaver–Opposed the ordinance; program is redundant to State law. <br />14.Devin Gates–Opposed the ordinance; supportive of the sunset date. <br />15.David Ivan Piccioni–Supported the ordinance; funds could help support pets and vegetation. <br />16.Beverly Lahr–Opposedthe ordinance; the program is not cost-effective. <br />17.Marshall Wilde –Supported the ordinance; provides high level conflict resolution. <br />18.Norton Cabell–Supported the ordinance; offers needed local enforcement mechanism. <br />19.James Barber–Supported the ordinance; absentee landlords are increasing in Eugene. <br />20.Matt Johnson–Opposed the ordinance; redundant policy and duplication of laws. <br />21.Tony McCown–Supported the ordinance; policy protects owners and renters. <br />22.Nathan Stevens–Supported the ordinance; provides a safety net for renters. <br />23.Kenneth Sergienko–Supported the ordinance; encourages conflict resolution. <br />24.John VanLandingham–Supported the ordinance; there is no State enforcement,only local. <br />25.Sean Shivers–Supported the ordinance; waste of time and money to keep sunset clause. <br />26.Jerry Hauenstein–Opposed the ordinance; no benefits for landlords. <br />27.Quinn Haugen–Supported the ordinance and abolishment of the sunset clause. <br />Council discussion: <br />We enact laws for those whodon’t behave themselves; programis needed and affordable. <br />Rental housing code should be expanded; sunset should be eliminated. <br />Review and report should come back to council before the end of fiveyears. <br />There is a lack of knowledge about this program, more outreach and education is needed. <br />If staff time spent on the billing was eliminated, the program wouldonly cost $150,000. <br />Opposed to the sunset date; can use funds for education and to help prevent evictions. <br />Screens should be added to the code to help with health issues like mosquitos. <br />Issues associated with reasonablerepair timesshould be acknowledged and mitigated. <br />Review of the fee from time to time should be included. <br />Sunset should be kept to see if the changes are actually working. <br />PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Allowing a New Recreational Marijuana Facility to <br />3. <br />Locate Less than 1000 Feet from Looking Glass New Roads School. <br />1.Eric Chavez–Supported the ordinance. <br />2.Janet Ayres–Opposed the ordinance; too much drug activity and criminal activityin this area. <br />Council discussion: <br />GlassRoots is at risk of losing investments and the city risks losing a local business. <br />The distance and geographic/physical barriers between the school and business warrant <br />granting this exemption. <br />Providingan aerial view of the locations would be helpful. <br />4§¤ ¬¤¤³¨¦ £©®´±¤£ ³ ΘȀΑΗ ¯ȁ¬ȁ <br />2¤²¯¤¢³¥´««¸ ²´¡¬¨³³¤£Ǿ <br />#§´¢ª #±®¢ª¤³³ <br />Deputy #¨³¸ 2¤¢®±£¤± <br />MINUTES –Eugene City CouncilJanuary 17, 2017Page 2 <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.