Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This proposed ordinance is similar in many ways to the 2003 ordinance which was adopted and then <br />later repealed. It would establish a TSMF to be paid by all customers having possession or control of <br />premises in the city. The fee would be used to fund operation, maintenance and preservation of the <br />existing transportation system, including funding to reduce the backlog of needed street repairs. The <br />ordinance would restrict the use of revenues to the prescribed purposes and would prohibit the use of <br />revenues for capacity-enhancing street improvements. <br /> <br />The rate methodology recommended by staff includes three components: 1) a variable trip-rate <br />component which uses estimated trip generation to measure a customer’s impact on the transportation <br />system; 2) a flat base rate component; and 3) a flat administrative fee component. The methodology <br />includes five residential and four non-residential customer property use categories. The current <br />estimated monthly fees for three typical use categories range from $5.22 for a single-family home and <br />$19.95 for a general office building measuring 12,000 square feet up to $824.75 per month for a <br />supermarket measuring 40,000 square feet. More specific details and additional sample fees are <br />included in the memo provided as Attachment A. <br /> <br />Finally, Attachment B is a Transportation Funding/Pavement Preservation Public Outreach and <br />Involvement Plan outlining the goals and strategies for a public outreach and education effort, as well as <br />the proposed key messages and audiences, along with a tactical implementation schedule for this <br />communication effort. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED COUNCIL GOALS AND POLICIES <br />The council’s Vision and Goals Statement with respect to Fair, Stable and Adequate Financial <br />Resources reaffirms its commitment to “a local government whose ongoing financial resources are <br />based on a fair and equitable system of taxation and other revenue sources and are adequate to maintain <br />and deliver municipal services.” The 2001-2002 City Council Work Plan Item 1 under this goal called <br />for an effort to “Identify and implement funding sources (including possible reallocation of existing <br />sources) for operation, maintenance and preservation of the transportation system.” It was based on this <br />charge that the Citizen’s Subcommittee on Transportation System Funding began meeting in September <br />2000 to study this issue and develop a report and recommendation. Additionally, the City’s Financial <br />Management Goals and Policy, A.4, states that the City’s municipal service priority Level 2 (second <br />only to the preservation of the public safety system) is to “maintain and replace the City’s fixed assets, <br />which includes… infrastructure…so as to optimize their life.” <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />Option 1: The council can direct the City Manager to schedule a public hearing on a proposed <br /> ordinance to establish a transportation maintenance fee, which would generate an <br /> approximate net $5.0 million for FY08 pavement preservation funding and $1.5 million for <br /> annual road operations funding needs. <br /> <br />Option 2: The council can direct the City Manager to modify the proposed ordinance prior to <br /> scheduling a public hearing. <br /> <br />Option 3: The council can choose to take no action at this time with regard to the need for additional <br /> pavement preservation and road operations funding. <br /> L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060724\S060724B.doc <br /> <br />