My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Jefferson-Westside Options for Immediate Protection
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 08/16/06 Work Session
>
Item B: Jefferson-Westside Options for Immediate Protection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:39 PM
Creation date
8/10/2006 3:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/16/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The information in this memo will explain that: <br /> <br />· In 1983 the Metro Plan and neighborhood plan were amended, through a public process <br />and it is clear through the legislative history that both plans encouraged medium density <br />residential housing in this subj ect area. <br />· The Metro Plan and Refinement Plan fell out of alignment due to changes in the legal <br />framework, which necessitated the Housekeeping Amendments in order to maintain the <br />policy intent of the 1983 amendments. <br />· If the Council wants to change the intent of the plans, just as in any other area of the <br />City, public processes are available to do so (outlined below). <br /> <br />Back!!round/Historv <br />There has been a notable change in the way neighborhood plans were adopted and applied over the years <br />since the City of Eugene began neighborhood plans. The Jefferson/Far West Refinement Plan provides a <br />typical example.ofthis history. During most of the 1980's and into the 1990's, the adoption process for <br />refinement plans (neighborhood plans) was handled differently than current day. Refinement Plans by <br />their very name were considered refinements of the Metro Plan. As such, they were considered <br />extensions of the Metro Plan, or from a legal perspective, an amendment to the Metro Plan. Under this <br />approach, the neighborhood-specific land use diagram clarified the intent of the Metro Plan, essentially <br />replacing it as the legally effective diagram. As such, one would only need to rely on the refinement plan <br />diagram for direction. <br /> <br />In the case of the Jefferson area, the Metro Plan showed low density residential for the area in question <br />prior to the adoption of the Jefferson/Far West Plan. When the refinement plan was adopted in 1983, it <br />specifically changed this subarea from low density to medium density residential with the requirement for <br />site review of future development. State law required that this change adopted in the refinement plan <br />could only take place if the Metro Plan was amended as well. The resolution that adopted the <br />Jefferson/Far West Plan (Resolution no. 3739) specifically verifies that the Metro Plan diagram was <br />amended as follows: <br /> <br />"The Land Use Diagram included in the Jefferson/Far West Refinement Plan is hereby adopted <br />as a refinement of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan diagram. The <br />explanatory text discussing each segment of the Land Use Diagram is recognized as clarifying <br />and providing furth er explanation of the intent of the Metro Plan diagram. " (Section 2, <br />Resolution No. 3739) <br /> <br />It should be noted that the adoption process for the refinement plan included an extensive public <br />involvement process. Most notable was the establishment of a citizen task force which helped develop <br />the refinement plan. Several informal public meetings were held with the neighborhoods which <br />eventually led to formal recommendations from the neighborhood organizations requesting adoption of <br />the refinement plan. Following that, the Planning Commission and City Council held public hearings to <br />consider these recommendations before .ultimately approving the refinement plan. <br /> <br />Since the adoption of the Refinement Plan in 1983, five zone changes have been approved in the subarea <br />in question, changing the affected properties from R-1 to R-2/SR. In order to be approved, all of these <br />zone changes were required to demonstrate compliance with the refinement plan and Metro Plan. What's <br />important to note is tbat over the last 20+ years, the City's procedures for plan amendments have evolved, <br />along with City code criteria. Based on court decisions regarding the relationship between the Metro Plan <br />and the City's refinement plans, the city beganto change the way neighborhood plans were adopted <br />during the 1990's. Rather than adopting neighborhood plans as guiding documents or extensions of the <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.