Laserfiche WebLink
department response to family violence incidents. In the first session, the commission reviewed crime <br />statistics and reporting requirements, work load and investigative capacity, and existing legislation, <br />policy and training parameters. A follow-up session was scheduled to discuss options for commission <br />involvement in the development of family violence intervention strategies that would work in tandem <br />with the department’s strategic initiative in domestic violence and that recognized the serious resource <br />limitations covering the entire spectrum of criminal justice services. The Police Commission also <br />discussed the department’s plans to update and standardize its policies and procedures manual as a first <br />step towards accreditation, using a subscription service to Lexipol as the framework for the review. <br />As a result of these work sessions, activities related to both family violence strategies and the police <br />policy manual transition are reflected in the commission’s proposed work plan. <br />The Police Commission continued to receive internal affairs case summaries on a quarterly basis. This <br />information was routinely reported in the Register-Guard,as was the information contained in the <br />presentation to the commission on the 2005 Internal Affairs case statistics. <br />B. Police Policy Review <br />As the commission’s work plan was primarily an extension of the previous year’s activities, no new <br />police policies were included for review this past year. However, the development of a policy for the <br />use of video cameras in patrol cars was a carryover item. The In-Car Video/Audio Recording Policy <br />Committee was originally formed at the September 2004 Police Commission meeting to assist the <br />department in creating a policy for the use of in-car video equipment. These systems can provide <br />objective evidence to document traffic and criminal violations, enhance officer safety, and assist in the <br />timely resolution of inquiries and complaints from community members.The commission approved a <br />draft policy at its February 2005 meeting, noting that the policy would need to be revisited to address <br />several technical and procedural issues that were left unresolved pending a system selection decision. <br />The committee reconvened in June to receive a progress report on the video system product evaluation <br />and vendor selection decision, and to review the latest draft of the policy. The committee provided its <br />conceptual approval of the draft policy, requesting a final review if any significant changes resulted <br />from discussions with the Eugene Police Employees’ Association. The committee also requested to <br />have an opportunity to review and comment on a project evaluation plan to be conducted one year after <br />system implementation. Phased installation of video units in patrol vehicles is scheduled to begin in <br />Fall 2006. <br />During this time period, the Police Commission received a one-year update on the status of its SWAT <br />policy recommendations. Lieutenant Kerns reported on the number of team activations compared to <br />the number of risk assessment matrices submitted. He noted that the risk assessment matrix developed <br />as a result of the commission’s review had been a useful evaluation tool and that additional <br />refinements were underway. It was also reported that the commission’s recommendation that the <br />department invest in updated communications equipment for the Crisis Negotiation Team had been <br />accomplished. <br />C. Resource Issues <br />As in past years, the Police Commission received an overview of the proposed police department FY07 <br />budget and reviewed salient portions of the City Manger’s budget request. These reviews are <br />scheduled to provide an opportunity for commissioners to stay informed of the city’s financial <br />environment and department’s funding sources and expenditures, and to comment on resource <br />Page <br /> 2 of 7 <br />2006 Police Commission Annual Report <br />