Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Adoption of Resolution 4887 Amending the Sustainable Buildings Policy Adopted By <br />Resolution No. 4884 <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: August 14, 2006 Agenda Item Number: 2C <br />Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Glen Svendsen <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />When the City Council adopted the Sustainable Building Policy, Resolution 4884, a change to the <br />exception policy was incorporated. This change, as worded, unintentionally made it mandatory that the <br />two reasons for requesting an exception both be met, rather than having either condition be sufficient for <br />requesting an exception. This agenda item is an amendment to Resolution 4884 that clarifies the waiver <br />language to provide that meeting either condition is a basis for requesting an exception from the council, <br />achieving the intent of the original revision to the exception policy in Resolution 4884. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />On July 10, 2006, the council adopted Resolution 4884, establishing a Sustainable Building Policy for <br />the siting, design, construction, operation and maintenance of City buildings. This resolution included <br />requirements that buildings 10,000 square feet or larger achieve a “Silver” certification under the U.S. <br />Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program. <br /> <br />Section 5 of Resolution 4884, as initially recommended by staff, also provided for reduction or waiver <br />of this certification requirement if specific conditions were met, or if the City Manager found a <br />reduction of waiver to be in the public interest. If achieving a Silver certification was not “cost-neutral,’ <br />the two specific conditions for requesting a reduction or exception to certification were: 1) that the <br />requirement to achieve Silver certification would result in costs 10% or greater than standard City <br />construction; or 2) if an outside agency providing the majority of funding for a project did not recognize <br />LEED certification as an acceptable project expense. <br /> <br />During the July 10 meeting, the council amended the proposed resolution to require City Council <br />approval of any reduction or waiver of the certification requirement. However, in doing so, the <br />language of the amendment inadvertently made it mandatory that both provisions be met for requesting <br />an exception to certification. <br /> <br />This resolution changes Section 5 of Resolution 4884 to clarify that the two conditions for requesting an <br />exception to the certification requirement are independent, and projects meeting either condition would <br />require City Council approval of a reduction or waiver of the certification requirement. <br /> <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060814\S0608142C.doc <br /> <br />