Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- ) . 5 4 % 3 <br /> <br />%´¦¤­¤ #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨« <br />( ±±¨² ( ««Ǿ ΐΑΔ % ²³ Η Avenue <br />th <br />%´¦¤­¤Ǿ /±¤¦®­ ΘΖΓΏΐ <br /> <br />* ­´ ±¸ 17Ǿ ΑΏΐ7 <br />ΖȀΒΏ ¯ȁ¬ȁ <br /> <br /> <br />#®´­¢¨«®±² 0±¤²¤­³Ȁ %¬¨«¸ 3¤¬¯«¤, "¤³³¸ 4 ¸«®±Ǿ !« ­ :¤«¤­ª Ǿ '¤®±¦¤ 0®«¨­¦Ǿ -¨ª¤ #« ±ª µ¨  ¯§®­¤Ǿ <br />'±¤¦ %µ ­²Ǿ #« ¨±¤ 3¸±¤³³Ǿ #§±¨² 0±¸®± <br /> <br /> <br />- ¸®± Vinis ®¯¤­¤£ ³§¤ * ­´ ±¸ 17Ǿ ΑΏΐ7Ǿ ¬¤¤³¨­¦ ®¥ ³§¤ %´¦¤­¤ #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨«. <br /> <br />4§¤ - ¸®±  ­£ #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨« observed   ¬®¬¤­³ ®¥ ²¨«¤­¢¤  ­£ ®¥¥¤±¤£ ¢®¬¬¤­³² ®¥ ±¤¬¤¬¡± ­¢¤ of <br />forme± #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨«®± !­£±¤  /±³¨¹ȁ <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING: A Resolution Granting a Measure 49 Claim and Waiving a <br />1. <br />th <br />Provision of Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971 for Property Located at 1777 E. 30 <br />Avenue, Eugene, Oregon (Assessor’s Map 18-03-08-11, Tax Lot 602 <br />) <br />1.Carolyn Jacobs –Opposed to the claim; usage doesn’t meet code, question about assessed value. <br />2.Bill Aspegren–Opposed to the claim; doesn’t have merit, could affect future code changes. <br />3.Janet Ayres–Opposed to imposing the claim; supportive of property rights. <br />4.John Barofsky–Supportedgranting the claim; new code preventsplanned development. <br />MOTION AND VOTE: <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to request <br />that the record be kept open for everybody until 5:00 p.m. on January 27, 2017,and for the <br />PASSED 8:0 <br />applicant until 5:00 p.m. on February 3, 2017. <br />PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Concerning the Rental Housing Code; Amending <br />2. <br />Sections 8.415, 8.425 and 8.430 of the Eugene Code, 1971, and Repealing the Sunset Date <br />1.Janet Ayres–Opposed to the ordinance for owner-occupied homes; code should be abolished. <br />2.John Thielking–Supported the ordinance; noting the local need for such protections. <br />3.Chris Wig–Supported the ordinance; was supported unanimously by rental housing committee. <br />4.Art Bollmann–Supported the ordinance; use the funds for loans or other options for those paying. <br />5.Celine Swenson Harris–Supported the ordinance; basic standards are needed for renters. <br />6.Bill Syrios–Opposed the ordinance; not fiscally responsible to keep program in effect. <br />7.Cliff Gray–Supported the ordinance; better education and outreach on the program is needed. <br />8.Scott Smith–Opposed the ordinance; doesn’t provide a cost benefit for citizens. <br />9.Bill Aspegren–Supported the ordinance; review process will allow for timely changes. <br />10.Brett Rowlett–Supported the ordinance; important to have a locally enforced code. <br />11.Dennis Casady–Opposedthe ordinance; sunset clause should be kept and code abolished. <br />12.Eric Hall–Opposed the ordinance; program is expensive and costs are passed onto renters. <br />13.Brian Weaver–Opposed the ordinance; program is redundant to State law. <br />14.Devin Gates–Opposed the ordinance; supportive of the sunset date. <br />MINUTES –Eugene City CouncilJanuary 17, 2017Page 1 <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />