Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HUMAN RIGHTS PROGRAM <br />FY 2006 ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS <br /> <br />GENDER IDENTITY CODE REVISION AND <br />COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT <br /> <br />The decision by the commission was made only after reviewing <br />a substantial amount of feedback from the community and hold- <br />ng a special session devoted entirely to the topic <br /> <br />In taking this action, the commission honored the request of the <br />Lane Gender Task Force, a group of transgender community <br />members working on gender identity rights and issues. Mem- <br />bers of the group provided compelling testimony that the major- <br />ity of the larger community does not yet appreciate the need for <br />legal protection based on gender identity or realize the level of <br />discrimination that many transgender people experience. The <br />Lane Gender Task Force expressed concerns that further public <br />debate at this time could harm the community's efforts to se- <br />cure equal legal protection and instead asked for assistance with <br />a collaborative, broad, multi-faceted community education cam- <br />paign <br /> <br />In November 2003, the commission created the Gender <br />Identity Work Group, which worked to educate the City or- <br />ganization and community on transgender issues. In Decem- <br />ber 2004, the group received permission from the Human <br />Rights Commission to develop draft code language and be- <br />gan this work in January 2005. The Gender Identity Work <br />Group forwarded a draft language proposal to the Human <br />Rights Commission in May 2005 <br /> <br />Further public testimony from transgender community mem- <br />bers indicated a difference of opinion on code language re- <br />garding public accommodation practices in showers, locker <br />rooms, and other sex-segregated spaces. Transgender com- <br />munity members worked together on code language that <br />was acceptable to all involved. However, concern about for- <br />warding code language was growing. On March 7, 2006, the <br />Human Rights Commission made the extremely difficult deci- <br />sion not to forward to the Eugene City Council draft legisla- <br />tion amending the City Code to include protection for people <br />who experience discrimination based on gender identity. <br />The commission also voted to work with allies on education <br />that helps further community awareness on gender identity <br />issues. <br /> <br />The commission voted to form a subcommittee of the Education <br />and Outreach Committee to work with the Lane Gender Task <br />Force to develop and implement an education program The <br />subcommittee goals are a part of the commission's FY <br />2007/2008 work plan. <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />FY 2007/2008 Work Plan <br /> <br />FY 2006 Annual Report and <br /> <br />Eugene Human Rights Commission <br />