Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Generally it is important to look ahead strategically and think long term about where we would like our <br />planning program to be and understand what types of opportunities and constraints could impact our <br />system. While this is not intended to be a comprehensive, complete list nor is it intended to be a <br />Strategic Plan, the following items have come to light for either the Planning Commission or the <br />Planning Division staff and are a good starting point for further discussion if additional time and other <br />resources become available. <br /> <br />~ There are outside forces to legislate changes to our land use systems at a statewide level. The City <br />of Eugene will need to continue to be strategic and be prepared to respond and develop policy for <br />dealing with these types of influences that may impact the way we implement our plans. <br /> <br />~ There have been some recent successes surrounding collaborative approaches to neighborhood <br />planning and conflict resolution which can be built upon. Moving away from a 'one size fits all' <br />approach has resulted in positive results and further discussion could help us build trust and <br />consensus in our community for planning projects. This relationship is especially important with <br />the city's individual neighborhoods, given the future challenges that lie ahead regarding infill and <br />mixed use centers. If a consensus based approach to land use is desired, the relationship between <br />the amount of regulation and ability to be flexible and to defer to the desires of all stakeholders <br />may need to be considered. <br /> <br />~ The city is experiencing a trend of increased requests to re-evaluate or change long standing policy <br />direction through Metro Plan and Refinement Plan Amendments. The age of many refinement <br />plans, changing markets and a decrease in easily developable properties all likely contribute to this <br />trend. . <br /> <br />~ Upcoming legislation at the State level may significantly affect the future of the city's role in <br />annexations. <br /> <br />~ Our partners in the Metro Plan, Springfield and Lane County, have been discussing publicly the <br />pros and cons of reevaluating their participation in the Metro Plan. This could have serious <br />consequences to our regional planning efforts. <br /> <br />~ With additional emphasis being placed on sustainability, there will likely be opportunities to define <br />specific roles in which the Planning Commission can assist. <br /> <br />~ The Planning Commission has an interest in incorporating better means to measure how policy <br />decisions the city makes match up with the Growth Management (GMS) Policies. Such efforts <br />may include revisiting the GMS policies with the public to confirm the community's support for <br />these principles. <br /> <br />~ The Planning Commission will look at and review their bylaws and operating philosophy and see if <br />updates are needed. <br /> <br />13 <br />