Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor Piercy and City Council <br />April 1, 2005 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />building area. In addition, as City Staff noted in the Limited Consultation <br />Conference, there is no code requirement that retail uses accompany medical clinic <br />uses on this parcel. Therefore, as Staff expressed in the Limited Consultation, there <br />currently do not appear to be any barriers that would prevent W&G Properties from <br />developing the property exclusively with medical clinic office uses. <br /> <br />Furthermore, the Chase Node Special Area Zone Development Standards and other <br />applicable development standards provide design standards that address site <br />planning, landscape, pedestrian and transit environments and architectural <br />considerations to promote compatibility between various uses in the node, to reduce <br />the impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood and to support nodal <br />development objectives. W&G Properties intends on complying with the Eugene <br />Code requirements. Therefore, their proposal will be consistent with nodal <br />development in the Chase Node Special Area Zone as approved by the City Council. <br /> <br />The prior owner's development proposal was challenged by the following code <br />requirements. The three code criteria were to provide a main entry on the street- <br />facing fac~ade, provide two functional floors, and eliminate drive-up services. <br />Although these code criteria support the nodal development concept2 established <br />through the lengthy public process, the Harlow Neighbors recommended <br />modification of these three code criteria in their letter to Tom Coyle, dated <br />November 4, 2004. (Reference attached letter.) In contrast, as stated above, W&G <br />Properties intends on proposing a development that meets the code criteria and thus <br />the intent of nodal development in the Chase Node Special Area Zone. <br /> <br />Even though W&G Properties' proposed medical clinic use complies with the Eugene <br />Code, the proposed conceptual plan has been the cause of concern by the <br />neighborhood because they would like a grocery store and a retail center on the <br />subject property. They are also concerned that medical clinic offices will generate <br />excessive traffic and parking impacts on the neighborhood (Jack Radabaugh. Guest <br />Viewpoint, The Register-Guard. February 15, 2005. Pg 11A.) <br /> <br />As stated above W&G Properties has been and continues to be sensitive to the <br />neighborhood's desire to have retail use(s) on the subject site. However, as Jack <br />Radabaugh pointed out in this Register-Guard article regarding the proposed <br />development by Simpson and Gramor, "[n]o builder was prepared to invest in a <br />project guaranteed to lose money." Simpson and Gramor might have conceptualized <br />a grocery store on the subject site. However, they did not have a committed grocery <br /> <br />2 Consistent with Eugene-Springfield TransPlan and Metro Plan, the Willakenzie Area Study, Chase Gardens <br /> <br />Subarea, identifies "[n]odal Development [as a] mixed-use, pedestrian friendly land use pattern that seeks to <br />increase concentrations of population and employment in well-defined areas with good transit service, a mix <br />of diverse and compatible land uses, and public and private improvements designed to be pedestrian and <br />transit oriented." (Exhibit B. Ordinance 20265. Pg Exhibit B-1.) <br /> <br /> <br />