My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C - Chase Garden Node
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/05 WS
>
Item C - Chase Garden Node
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:17:44 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 8:33:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />December 8, 2004 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br /> Yes, the maximum building height of 50 feet for commercial can be adjusted <br /> through an Adjustment Review application in accordance with EC 9.8030(18). <br /> Kurt added that the neighbors have expressed a strong desire for retail use on <br /> the subject site. He thinks that there will probably be public concern if there is <br /> no retail proposed in the development of the subject site. Kurt referred to a <br /> letter from Tom Coyle regarding neighbor concerns. Kurt said that he would <br /> make a copy of this letter available to Kristen. <br /> <br /> Kurt also noted that Garden Way is viewed by the City as the #1 street of <br /> importance to the Chase Garden Node and Marche Chase is #2 street. <br /> Therefore, it will be tougher to adjust code standards for development along <br /> Garden Way. <br /> <br />9. Do the conceptual buildings proposed on the conceptual site plan meet the <br /> applicable setback and building orientation requirements? <br /> <br /> Katharine said that the buildings proposed on the conceptual site plan appear <br /> to meet the setback requirements. Katharine noted that the City will review the <br /> setback requirements and all other related land use criteria once the final <br /> drawings are submitted for review. So we need to make sure that all of the <br /> relevant requirements are met in the final set of drawings. <br /> <br /> Kurt added that the City recognizes the potential difficultly in meeting the <br /> setback requirements in the curvy sections of Marche Chase Drive and Garden <br /> Way so the City is open to adjustments to the setback standards. <br /> <br /> 10. Have we represented the zoning and street classification listed above under the <br /> "Site Characteristics and Surrounding Uses" correctly? <br /> <br /> Yes, we have represented the zoning and street classification listed above under <br /> the "Site Characteristics and Surrounding Uses" correctly. <br /> <br /> 11. Have we overlooked any public improvement or land use codes affected by the <br /> proposed conceptual site plan? If yes, please explain. <br /> <br /> · Have we misinterpreted any code requirements presented within our <br /> questions and/or enclosed in the drawing? <br /> <br /> At this conceptual stage, it is difficult for the City to closely review compliance <br /> with all of the code standards. As stated above, we need to verify that the <br /> applicant's development proposal meets all of the relevant code standards and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.