My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/05 Mtg
>
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:07:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 8:39:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· focus groups <br /> · personal interviews <br /> · phone interviews <br /> · document review <br /> · City Council and Police Commission meetings <br /> · media and other news releases <br /> · toll-free telephone line for citizens to express their views about the department <br /> and offer recommendations <br /> <br />Dr. Fisher Stewart stated there were 57 recommendations (must do) and 12 advisories (reminders) listed in <br />the report. She said these components were in three broad categories: Police/Community Relations, <br />Governance, and Police Management Procedures and Practices. She noted that ICMA was responsible for <br />the former two categories; PERF was responsible for the latter. <br /> <br />Dr. Fisher Stewart referred to previous recommendations that were the outcome of a 1997 study of the <br />EPD and its practices and were listed on pages 9 and 10 of the report. She pointed out that almost all of <br />these recommendations continue to be valid today. Dr. Fisher Stewart questioned if the current report <br />would have been necessary if those recommendations had been implemented earlier. <br /> <br />Dr. Fisher Stewart referred to the over-arching recommendation that was listed on page 16 of the report: <br />The review team strongly recommends that the City of Eugene contract this effort to someone from outside <br />the City whose sole job is to oversee this transformation process. <br /> <br />Dr. Fisher Stewart strongly emphasized the fact that the team did not receive input from a critical mass of <br />the people of Eugene as it formed its conclusions and noted it was vital as the process moves forward that <br />input from the "grass roots" of the community be tapped. Dr. Fisher Stewart pointed to the Mayor's one- <br />on-one meetings and the Police Commission and the Human Rights Commission forums as formats which <br />were adept in bringing people into the process. She stressed that there needs to be a concerted effort to <br />provide an opportunity for community members to be heard and responded to, and to ensure that facts <br />were put out to the community-at-large. Dr. Fisher Stewart pointed out that much of the information <br />received from the community were perceptions. <br /> <br />Dr. Fisher Stewart stated that the City needed to determine community expectations for community <br />policing and fully implement that model. She conceded that community policing was difficult and must <br />be tailored to Eugene. Dr. Fisher Stewart also stressed that transparency must be achieved within the <br />community policing model. <br /> <br />Dr. Fisher Stewart stated that the report recommended an external review board be implemented and that <br />it not become another bureaucratic layer. She said that with the implementation of such a board, resources <br />must be available to process complaints on a timely basis so as not to create additional problems and <br />ineffectiveness. Dr. Fisher Stewart said that the complaint process should also be less threatening than it <br />currently was, and she referred to the following statement which appears on page 21, Recommendation <br />No. 5 of the report: The department routinely checks the police records of the people with whom we have <br />contact, including people who file complaints. Ifa police officer has contact with you and is aware of a <br />warrant, he/she is legally compelled to arrest you. However, we do not want this to prevent you from <br />giving us feedback. If you have an outstanding warrant, please clear it with the Court. She opined that <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council March 9, 2005 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.