My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/05 Mtg
>
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:07:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 8:39:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> February 9, 2005 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Betty Taylor, David Kelly, Gary Pap6, <br /> Bonny Bettman, Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy called the work session of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: Remand of Hospital Ordinance No. 20299 <br /> <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein explained that the ordinance in question was adopted a year ago when the <br />council was seeking to facilitate the location of a hospital somewhere in Eugene. The ordinance allowed <br />for the location of a hospital in most parts of Eugene. He termed it a broad-brush approach to locating a <br />hospital due to the uncertainty of where the hospitals would eventually be. Subsequently, the decision <br />was appealed to the Court of Appeals by the Coalition for Health Options in Central Eugene-Springfield <br />(CHOICES). The court ruled that hospitals could not be located as an outright use in a residential zone as <br />it may or may not be consistent with the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan; it depended <br />on the nature of the hospital in question. The same was true of industrial zones. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein said that the ordinance was not back before the City Council so there was no urgency for action. <br />However, staff had some recommendations for proceeding. He noted the relocation of McKenzie- <br />Willamette/Triad to the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) site was not firm. Mr. Klein said the <br />council could choose to repeal the entire ordinance, retain those elements of the ordinance not challenged <br />by the petitioners, or develop a response to address some of the issues raised by the court with regard to <br />the industrial and residential zones. The City could not deal with the remand with simple factual findings. <br />Mr. Klein noted that the Agenda Item Summary (AIS) described the options in more detail. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein suggested councilors declare potential conflicts of interest at this point. Mr. Pryor declared a <br />potential conflict of interest due to his wife's employment with McKenzie-Willamette/Triad. Ms. Ortiz <br />declared a similar potential conflict because of her employment with PeaceHealth. Mr. Klein said that the <br />conflicts at this point were potential, and the councilors could participate in the discussion. <br /> <br /> Mayor Piercy called on the council for comments and questions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor wanted to repeal the ordinance as she thought its initial adoption was a mistake, particularly in <br /> regard to its application to residential areas. She had been happy to hear of the ordinance's remand. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman said things had changed since the adoption of the ordinance. When the council had adopted <br /> the ordinance, no site for a new hospital in Eugene had yet been identified, and the council's focus was on <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 9, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.