Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly shared Ms. Bettman's concern. He felt a lot of the smoking areas were rooms for all purposes <br />and intents because of the way the administrative rule was written or because an establishment disre- <br />garded the rule. He was not opposed to giving some latitude to smokers who go to a bar and want a truly <br />outdoor area in which they could have drinks as well. He felt there would be enough air circulation that a <br />server could occasionally enter an outdoor area to intervene in an altercation or other small emergencies. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor commented that even if it was truly outdoors, there was still some danger to the people who <br />serve and the people who clean up. <br /> <br />Ms. Osborn said it seemed that staff had clear direction to come back with some proposals. City Manager <br />Taylor reiterated that it would be confined to bars and restaurants and would seek to protect employees <br />from second-hand smoke. <br /> <br />Mr. Lidz thought it possible to adopt a blanket 25-foot buffer for all publicly owned buildings, but he did <br />not think the City could enforce it against the State or federal governments. He added that it was less <br />clear regarding the County buildings. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Pap6, Ms. Osborn said the City would pursue signage noting the 25- <br />foot buffer. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy ascertained that no members of the council opposed the 25-foot buffer. The council <br />indicated unanimous support. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked if the item could be included in the Consent Calendar, noting that Mr. Poling <br />could pull it if he wished. The council indicated unanimous support for placement of the ordinance on the <br />Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor said he would ask Mr. Lidz and staff to look into what the council could do to keep <br />from having a rush on permit applications for the construction of outdoor smoking areas. <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: <br /> Downtown City Space Master Planning <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor noted that Mike Penwell, Principal Facility Project Manager for the Facilities <br />Division of the Central Services Department (CSD), was ill. As such, Facilities Division manager, Glen <br />Svendsen, and Assistant City Manager Jim Carlson were standing in as staff for this item. <br /> <br />Mr. Svendsen said this was the continuation of an item begun in November 2004. He recalled that there <br />had been general consensus on the part of the council that a master planning process that would include <br />public processes was needed for the downtown City spaces. He recalled that the council had been <br />uncomfortable with the $750,000 price tag for the process and noted that the Eugene Water & Electric <br />Board (EWEB) was also engaging in a similar process, slated to cost it $792,000. He related that staff had <br />returned in January with a proposal that broke the process into stages, with the first stage slated to be a <br />scoping element costing $75,000 that would involve both the council and the public in the development of <br />the process. He provided a brief overview of the five options on how the master planning process should <br />proceed. The fifth option was to take no action. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 23, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />