Laserfiche WebLink
Roll call vote; the motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the <br /> exception of Item C, passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor stated that the councilors had copies of an e-mail with a proposed amendment to <br />include all public buildings in the smoking ordinance. <br /> <br /> Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend <br /> subsection (2)(k) of Section 6.230 of the proposed ordinance by removing <br /> the proposed deletion of the words 'publicly owned' and deleting the <br /> proposed phrase 'owned by the City,' both occurring in the first line of <br /> that subsection, deleting the remaining proposed revisions to subsection <br /> (2) and revising the lead sentence of subsection (2) accordingly. Roll call <br /> vote; the amendment passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt Item <br /> C as amended. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING and POSSIBLE ACTION: FY06-FYll Draft Capital Improvement <br /> Program <br /> <br />Councilor Poling stated that no action would be taken on this item at Councilor Pap6's request. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor explained that this was the public hearing on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) <br />that had been discussed by the Budget Committee. He asked Patty Boyle, Senior Management Analyst for <br />the Finance and Court Services Division of the Central Services Department to speak to the CIP. <br /> <br />Ms. Boyle said the CIP was developed by compiling the capital projects found in adopted long-range <br />plans and in the context of the City's long-range goals and policies. She further explained that the CIP <br />was a planning document that provided policy-makers with a view of the anticipated capital investment in <br />the City's infrastructure over the next six years and that it also acted as a basis for the proposed capital <br />budget, though it did not authorize the spending of any funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Boyle stated that copies of the CIP were posted to the Web site and were distributed to the chairs of <br />all of the neighborhood associations, as well as the Planning Commission, the Budget Committee, and all <br />interested parties. She noted that an opportunity to have a staff presentation on the CIP had been made to <br />all neighborhood associations and opportunities to comment on the CIP were advertised in The Register- <br />Guard and the Eugene Weekly. All public testimony was included in the council material packets for the <br />current meeting. <br /> <br /> Ms. Boyle pointed out that both the Planning Commission and the Budget Committee had completed their <br /> review of the CIP and had recommended approval of it with amendments. She encouraged the council to <br /> identify any questions that might arise so that they could be adequately addressed prior to action on the <br /> item, now scheduled for March 7. <br /> <br /> Mr. Poling opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 28, 2005 Page 6 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />