My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4 - PH on River Ave.LID
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/05 Mtg
>
Item 4 - PH on River Ave.LID
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:10:05 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 8:39:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The BOC should also know that ethical practices of city staff were called into question at <br />the Septemberl 3, 2004 Eugene City Council meeting after staff directed the Heatings <br />Official not to prepare a report for the City Council. The Heatings Official at the <br />July 28, 2004 public hearing announced that he could not send forward a favorable <br />recommendation to the City Council if Lane County did not allow for the formation of a <br />LID and allow the City to assess property outside the City. The BOC voted unanimously <br />(4-0) on August 4, 2004 not to approve the City request to assess property outside the city <br />limits (Commissioner Green absent). At the February 9, 2005 BOC meeting, <br />Commissioner Sorenson asked if the Board Order in the packet had been approved at the <br />August 4, 2004 BOC meeting and the answer was "no". Commissioner Green then stated <br />that "no action" was taken, which is simply incorrect. The BOC on August 4, 2004 voted <br />unanimously to oppose the City request to assess outside the City. The Eugene City <br />Council also voted (8-0) to oppose the forced island annexation. <br />This entire process has become tainted, which is exactly what the Mayor and the City <br />Councilors said they wanted to avoid when they met on September 13, 2004 and voted <br />unanimously (8-0) to oppose the River Avenue island annexation proposal. Please see the <br />attached outline of the public heating process to date, along with minutes from the <br />September 13, 2004 Eugene City Council meeting and a couple of written submittals in <br />opposition to this project which I retrieved from my files. <br />Therefore, I am requesting the Lane County Board of Commissioners to re-consider this <br />River Avenue issue again, and to reverse the action taken at your February 9, 2005 <br />meeting and to revert to your previous position in opposition to the City's request which <br />was a unanimous vote against granting the City of Eugene authority to assess county <br />property owners outside the city. Please do not needlessly force the small business owners <br />on River Avenue to appear again before the City Council in a redundant process. Please <br />listen to us and put an end to this process now and revert back to your August 4, 2004 <br />original decision to oppose the request from the City of Eugene. Both jurisdictions have <br />previously heard and taken action in opposition to this project. <br />I hereby request that the BOC provide a timely written response to this request, which I <br />will provide to the other small business and property owners on River Avenue. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Gordon B. Howard <br />P.O. Box 775 <br />Pleasant Hill, OR 97455 <br />541-747-8206 <br /> <br /> River Avenue Exhibit C <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.