Item 4 - PH on River Ave.LID - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Residentially zoned properties will be assessed for the cost of seven feet of the pavement improvements, and for sidewalk improvements. Commercial, industrial and public property will be assessed for a ten foot pavement width, and for sidewalk improvements. Ms. Cahill indicated that just over half of the total cost of the project would paid by the City of Eugene, using revenues from transportation systems development charges. Several of the property owners, or their representatives, were present at the hearing. Property owners present included Gordon B. Howard, Michael Keamey (an attorney for Mr. & Mrs. Meeker), Lloyd Henson, Theresa Slocum, Charles Meeker and Patt Meeker. Present representing the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission were Todd Anderson (City of Eugene) and Steve Templin (City of Springfield). As Ms. Cahill was concluding her remarks about the City's proposed share of the cost of the project, Mr. Lloyd Henson pointed out that developers in the City, including property owners along River Avenue had akeady paid a portion of the cost of the project by paying SDCs. In response to a question as to what SDCs were, Ms. Cahill explained that SDCs were charges levied on development within the City to have these developments pay a portion of the costs of the public infrastructure that the development would use. Ms. Cahill acknowledged that any recent development along River Avenue would have contributed to the City's SDC accounts. Ms. Cahill reminded the audience that these SDC cllarges served many purposes, so SDC payments by development along River Avenue would have contributed to infrastructure improvements throughout the ' City, and developments elsewhere would be contributing a portion of their payments to the River Avenue improvements. A general discussion of several aspects of the project followed, with property owners quickly making statements and asking questions on a range of issues, and Ms. Cahill and Project Engineer Joe Ramirez answering each question in turn. The first question concerned why the costs were to be divided in the way proposed, with property owners paying nearly half the cost of the project. Ms. Cahill explained that the process for division of costs was set by the Eugene Code, which states that property owners adjacent to a major collector will pay for either seven or ten feet of pavement width, depending on the zoning of the property, and which calls for the City to pay for many of the improvements that are called for by established street improvement standards. This led to a question about the need for many of the improvements. The questioner wondered about the need for amenities such as sidewalks, when there were no pedestrian oriented businesses along the street. Ms. Cahill explained that the street improvements were designed according to established standards, some set by federal regulations, others adopted standards of the City. These standards called for the installation of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, street trees and other design elements incorporated into the project. Ms. Cahill also pointed out that there were many pedestrians along a portion of the street, as well as many bicyclists who used River Avenue as a means to gain access to the Willamette River and the bicycle path along the River. Ms. Cahill was asked about the presentation that was made to the Lane County Commissioners, and what would happen if the Commissioners said that the properties outside the City limits could not be assessed. Ms. Cahill characterized the discussion