Laserfiche WebLink
as to the real market value. For purposes of this appeal, the real <br />market values contained in the administrative order and in the <br />records of Lane County Assessment and Taxation shall be <br />conclusively presumed correct. No appraisal or other information <br />may be presented to or considered by the hearings officer. The city <br />manager shall forward the notice of determination of the amount of <br />the charge and requirement for its deposit to the applicant. The <br />notice shall contain a statement that failure to submit the deposit by <br />the date set forth in the notice will result in the imposition of a lien <br />against the applicant’s property, which shall be recorded in the city’s <br />lien docket. <br />(3) If the applicant submits a deposit under subsection (1) of this <br />section based on an appraisal, the city manager shall inform the <br />applicant, as provided for in subsection (5) of section 2.105, whether <br />the city accepts the real market values contained in the applicant’s <br />appraisal. If the city does not accept those values, and if the final <br />determination of real market values (after the city obtains an <br />appraisal and possibly after a hearing) establishes values that result <br />in a greater change in value than calculated by the applicant, the <br />applicant shall submit the additional value-added charge that is due. <br />Failure to do so shall result in the imposition of a lien for the <br />additional amount due, which shall be recorded in the city’s lien <br />docket. <br /> <br /> <br />2.115 Real Property Value-Added Charge – Non-Requested Changes. <br />(1) Purpose. This section governs the imposition of the real property <br />value-added charge when the change in zoning, plan designation or <br />UGB status is not one that had been requested by or on behalf of the <br />property owner. In this situation, the charge shall be imposed only if <br />a property owner decides to seek a regulatory approval – such as <br />approval of a development permit, land division, or other land use <br />permit – that could not be approved if the change in zoning, plan <br />designation or UGB status had not been approved. <br />(2) The city shall forward to a property owner who becomes subject to a <br />real property value-added charge as a result of an action initiated by <br />the city under section 2.100(3)(b) a notice identifying a potential real <br />property value-added charge. The charge will not become due and <br />payable until such time as the property owner takes some action <br />such as the submission of an application for a development or land <br />use permit that relies upon and takes advantage of the city-initiated <br />action. If there are multiple city-initiated actions involving the same <br />property occurring at different times, the charge shall be computed <br />for each individual action as though it were being imposed at that <br />time. The notice shall be recorded in the city’s lien docket as a <br />potential future charge upon the property. <br />(3) Upon receipt of a notice under subsection (2), a property owner who <br />disagrees with the city’s valuations may appeal the city’s <br />Ordinance - <br />4 <br /> <br />