My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 10/23/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:38 PM
Creation date
10/19/2006 10:38:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/23/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to remove the word “residential” <br />from Item 9. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly asked for clarification on the work item as he understood the task was only to conduct a scope of <br />work, not begin a residential land inventory. Ms. Colbath indicated the item was only scoping, not an <br />inventory. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he would vote against the amendment on that basis. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz requested permission to change her vote on the Ms. Taylor’s motion. <br />There were no objections. The motion still failed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bettman <br />and Ms. Ortiz voting in favor. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said it was out of order for the commission to put work on a residential buildable land <br />analysis, even just the scoping, in the work plan before the council had held a work session. She said it was <br />a planning issue regulated by State statute as opposed to being preempted by the Planning Commission; it <br />did not belong in the work program as it was addressed within other regulatory procedures. She would not <br />endorse the item as it would set the wheels in motion to make it happen. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said he saw no problem with gathering information about what resources would be required to <br />conduct the analysis; the knowledge would be helpful. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he would support the amendment as a work session on the issue could return the item to the <br />work plan. <br /> <br />The vote on the motion to amend was tied, 4:4; Ms. Bettman, Ms. Ortiz, Ms. Tay- <br />lor, and Mr. Kelly voting in favor; Ms. Solomon, Mr. Poling, Mr. Pryor, and Mr. <br />Papé voting in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in opposition, and the motion failed <br />on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />The main motion passed, 6:2; Ms. Taylor and Ms. Bettman voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Ms. Colbath commented that the commission hoped to use effective communications to bring information to <br />the council and receive feedback. She said that joint meetings were extremely useful for strategic discus- <br />sions of issues such as opportunity siting and infill standards and helped the commission better meet council <br />expectations and forecast major policy issues and trends. She said the commission was committed to <br />creative public involvement like the open forums with citizens, which enhanced collaboration with <br />stakeholders. She indicated that the commission would also continue with informal communications such as <br />the “council buddy” system. She thanked the council again for the opportunity to have a joint meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor added her thanks to the Planning Commission for its work. <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher drew the council’s attention to Item 12.i, which referenced assessing the extent to which the <br />City had a clear and widely supported vision and strategy for achieving it. He said without a vision and <br />strategy it would be difficult to move beyond arguing disparate opinions about growth management policies. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé expressed his appreciation for the “buddy system” as it had helped him better understand some of <br />the complex issues facing the community. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council September 27, 2006 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.