Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Summary of Nonresidential SDC Classes <br />Class Development Types <br />A Hotels, motels, B&Bs, & other tourist accommodations <br />B Office (financial, investment, real estate, government, medical, legal & other <br />business/professional services), institutional, grocery, eating & drinking <br />establishments <br />C Industrial, wholesale, manufacturing, transportation, agriculture <br />D General retail & services, recreation <br />E Commercial warehousing & storage <br /> <br /> – For purposes of SDC <br />Step 2: Allocation of Equivalent Population to Nonresidential Classes <br />assessment, the RAC has recommended that the impact of tourist accommodation rooms be <br />determined consistent with residential dwelling units: based on the average persons per unit, <br />unadjusted for occupancy rates. Table 2 shows the calculation of equivalent population (i.e., <br />guests) for tourist accommodation development. Growth in guests is estimated based on the <br />projected growth in the number of rooms (507) and average occupancy per room (1.93). As the <br />table indicates, the portion of growth equivalent population attributable to tourist <br />accommodation development is 979. <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />Calculation of Nonresidential SDC <br /> (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) <br />Nonres. Units Persons Estimated % of Total Equiv. Equiv. SDC <br />Category per Unit Persons Employees Population Pop. per per <br />Unit Unit <br /> <br /> Unit = Room per Room <br />A 507 979 na 979 $2,127 <br />1.93 1.93 <br /> Unit = TGSF per TGSF <br />B 3,210 10,722 54.2% 4,130 $1,422 <br />3.34 1.29 <br />C 2,467 5,083 25.7% 1,958 $871 <br />2.06 0.79 <br />D 3,124 3,781 19.1% 1,456 $518 <br />1.21 0.47 <br />E 387 190 1.0% 73 $209 <br />0.49 0.19 <br />Subtotal 9,189 19,775 100.0% 7,618 <br />Total 9,384 20,754 8,596 <br />The equivalent population, net of tourist accommodation rooms, is then allocated to the other <br />classes of nonresidential development based on two variables: building size (i.e., TGSF) and <br />employment density (i.e., number of employees per TGSF). Current employment data by <br />standard industrial classification were analyzed along with data on existing building square <br />footage to determine estimated employment density by nonresidential class. Table 2 (column b) <br />shows the estimated number of employees per TGSF by class based on this analysis. The growth <br />in TGSF by class over the study period (column a) was estimated based on the current TGSF and <br />an assumed growth rate of 1.1 percent per year over the planning horizon (equal to estimated <br />population growth). From this information, the growth in employees by class was determined <br />PSDCNOA P610 <br />ARKS ONRESIDENTIAL PTIONS ATTACHMENT AGE OF <br /> <br />