My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/18/06 Process Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 09/18/06 Process Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:28 AM
Creation date
10/25/2006 9:25:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Process Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/18/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with various people and discuss certain things many times. She did not think it was in her purview to ask <br />him to take action on a legal issue in which the City of Eugene was involved. She added that City Attorney <br />Glenn Klein, when representing the City, took the stance that best represented the City; and when the council <br />asked for legal opinions, Mr. Klein gave his best opinion to the council based on his legal knowledge. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thought it would be beneficial to have another attorney at the next process session. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor underscored that the City Attorney represented the City and the council as the <br />governing body of the City. He stated that the City Attorney was not an agent of the administration. He <br />pointed out that in the prior firing of a city manager, the City Attorney represented the City and the city <br />manager had to engage her own attorney. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé thought the City could hire another attorney to provide an opinion. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he would not want any rule that would prevent taking another attorney’s phone call. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman felt the larger issue was whether councilors could go to individual attorneys. She alleged that <br />regardless of what one said, when she had talked with other municipalities’ representatives, people there <br />believed that the City Attorney represented the City Manager, because the City Manager signed the checks. <br />She recommended adding this issue to the next process session. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor wanted to make a distinction between an attorney’s opinion and a City Attorney’s <br />opinion. He said in terms of Oregon common law, there was a large distinction between the two. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor ascertained from the council that there was majority support for addressing this item <br />in a work session. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council September 18, 2006 Page 12 <br /> Process Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.