Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Carmichael said it appeared that staff and commissioner comments indicated that there was a noise <br />issue. He stated for the record his hope that the elected bodies would take a close look at the noise issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher c.ommented that holding t.o the 150 f.o.ot setback would have a p.ositive impact .on n.oise <br />mitigati.on. <br /> <br />Mr. Dignam said he believed there was a conflict due t.o noise but the mitigati.ons suggested by the <br />applicant were adequate. He said he would supp.ort the mitigati.on measures as pr.oP.osed. He stressed the <br />imp.ortance .of I.o.oking at the big picture .of all the mitigati.on measures being proposed. <br /> <br />The Eugene Planning C.ommission t.o.ok a straw vote and established general agreement <br />that there was a c.onflict due t.o n.oise. <br /> <br />Ms. CQlbath called f.or a straw v.ote that the pr.oPosed mitigati.on measures were sufficient <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless reiterated that mitigati.on measures WQuld comply with DEQ standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Belcher questi.oned whether the DEQ standards were sufficient fQr the neighb.ors. He added that <br />c.onstructi.on.of the '.ow permeability barrier W.ould have its .own impacts and raised c.oncern that there was <br />n.ot sufficient mitigati.on. <br /> <br />Mr. Lanfear said the C.onflict was minimized if the n.oise met DEQ standards. <br /> <br />The result of the straw VQte was 3:2 with C.ommissionersC.olbath and Carr.oII V.oting in <br />.oPP.ositi.on. <br /> <br />The Lane CQunty Planning C.ommissi.on t.ook a straw vote and unanim.ously decided that <br />there was a conflict due tQ nQise <br /> <br />The Lane County Plannirig C.ommissiQn ta.ok a straw v.ote an whether the C.onflict CQuld be <br />minimized by the proP.osed mitigati.on measures. The resultmg vote was C.ommissi.oners <br />Carmichael, Dignam, and Nich.ols v.oting yes, Commissioners Arkin and Zdzienicki v.oting <br />n.o and Commissioner Becker abstaining. <br /> <br />. . Flooding <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should find that there was no conflict due to <br />flooding. <br /> <br />There was consensus t.o review the record and address the fl.ooding C.onflicts at a future meeting. <br /> <br />. Groundwater <br /> <br />Staff recommended that the Planning Commission find that there was a conflict due to groundwater <br />that could be minimized by constructing the low permeability barrier~ The applicant should be <br /> <br />MINUTES~Lane C.ounty .Plamiing C.ommissi.on. . , . . <br /> <br />~July.25, 2006 ..' <br /> <br />. Page 15 <br />