Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Dignam said he accepted the staff conclusion. He stressed that there was no conflict with <br />transportation in the application. <br /> <br />Ms. Colbath noted that the record showed that the applicant had stated that trips would not increase so <br />there was no conflict. <br /> <br />Eugene Planning Commission took a straw vote with the result of unanimous <br />consensus that there was no conflict due to traffic impacts. <br /> <br />Lane County Planning Commission took a straw vote with unanimous consensus <br />that there was no conflict due to traffic impacts. <br /> <br />Next Steps <br /> <br />Ms. Schulz suggested meeting every Tuesday until the deliberations were completed. <br /> <br />There was general consensus to tentatively schedule further deliberations for August 8 and August 15. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 10 pm. <br />(Recorded by JoeSams) <br /> <br />MINUTES-:..Lane County Planning Commission <br /> <br />,.July:25;:'2006 <br /> <br />Page' 17 <br />