Laserfiche WebLink
FILE RECORD CONTENT SHEET <br /> <br />Ordinance No. PA 1238 <br /> <br />No. Item Date <br /> <br />52. Exhibit 40 – Estimate for Cost of Change in Agricultural Practices 01/17/06 <br /> at Full Circle Community Farm, K. Jones & K. Perle 01/17/06 <br />53. Exhibit 41 – photo of culvert at Miles Lane and Taito 01/17/06 <br />54. Exhibit 42 – photos of flooding on Summer St. and Gerald Ave. 01/17/06 <br />55. Exhibit 43 – letter from Sierra Club Debra Higbee, author 01/17/06 <br />56. Exhibit 44 – letter from Paul Atkinson, Laughing Stock Farm 01/17/06 <br />57. Exhibit 45 – letter from Land Watch Lane County 01/17/06 <br />58. Exhibit 46 – Letter from Karen Reed 01/17/06 <br />59. Exhibit 47 – Rebuttal to opposition from EGR & Assoc. 01/17/06 <br /> addressing groundwater mitigation, flooding, alternative to <br /> alluvial aggregate, improper sampling accusation <br />60. Exhibit 48 – Rebuttal to opposition from EGR & Assoc. 01/17/06 <br /> addressing underground dam concerns, BFE datum adjustment <br />61. Exhibit 49 – letter from George Staples, applicant’s geologist 01/17/06 <br /> includes DOGAMI update to Reclamation Plan and <br /> revised noise mitigation map and implementing measures <br />62. Exhibit 50 – letter from Steve Cornacchia, applicant’s attorney 01/17/06 <br />63. Exhibit 51 – memo from LRAPA 01/17/06 <br />64. Exhibit 52 – email from Charles Oppenheimer, noise consultant 01/17/06 <br />65. Exhibit 53 – Wind Rose Diagrams from LRAPA, Dick Ruth 01/17/06 <br />66. Exhibit 54 – Letter from Dan Stotter, attorney for the opposition 01/17/06 <br />67. Minutes – Joint Eugene and Lane Co PC Hearing Continuation 01/17/06 <br />68. Cover letter from Steve Cornacchia, attorney for applicant 02/16/06 <br />69. Exhibit 55 – EGR & Associates Inc. rebuttal to M. Reed & 02/16/06 <br /> M. Kupilas regarding significance of the resource and <br /> groundwater <br />70. Exhibit 56 – Bridgewater Group, Inc. rebuttal C. Sears air quality/dust 02/16/06 <br />71. Exhibit 57 – EGR & Associates, Inc. rebuttal to E. Perkins 02/16/06 <br /> regarding wetlands <br />72. Exhibit 58 – Daly Standlee & Associates, Inc. response to A. Noxon 02/16/06 <br /> regarding noise <br />73. Exhibit 59 – Peer review testimony from John Hector 02/16/06 <br /> of Daly Standlee & Assoc. & of A. Noxon (noise) <br />74. Exhibit 60 – Applicant response to A. Noxon testimony (noise) 02/16/06 <br />75. Exhibit 61 – Peer review testimony from Environmental Associates 02/16/06 <br /> Inc. of A.Noxon study (noise) and C. Sears (air pollution) <br />76. Exhibit 62 – Response to EGR’s assertion of significance of the 03/17/06 <br /> resource from Mark. H. Reed <br />77. Exhibit 63 – Response to Bridgewater testimony (dust) from 03/17/06 <br /> James E. Knepler <br />78. Exhibit 64 – Letters from Robert Funk (dust, groundwater, noise) 03/17/06 <br />79. Exhibit 65 – Rebuttal to applicant from Doug DuPriest, attorney 03/17/06 <br /> for Joel & Therese Narva (dust, noise, groundwater, wetlands) <br />80. Exhibit 66 – Applicant’s final rebuttal 03/31/06 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Printed 10/26/06 <br />