My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/01/06 JEO Meeting
>
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:50 PM
Creation date
10/26/2006 8:42:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Staff Memo
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/1/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />which was an analysis of ambient noise levels. He said it would be demonstrated that the ambient noise <br />levels from the quarry activities would also meet Department of Environmental quality noise standards. <br /> <br />Mr. Cornacchia said Delta Sand.and Gravel had been a good neighbor in the area for 80 years. He showed <br />an aerial map of the Delta property. He stressed that the- company had conformed with every <br />environmental and regulatory standard that had been applied. He showed the Delta area on the map and <br />noted that a portion of the property abutted a residential area and stressed that there had been no citations <br />or complaints filed against the company. He acknowledged that there had been a recent citation for dirt on: <br />River Loop Road that was still under discussion. He said. demonstrating that the company did what it was <br />supposed to do was how he defined a good neighbor. He said Delta was only asking to remove material <br />from the area. in question and was not requesting to move its rock crusher or any other processing <br />equipment. He noted that it was the processing of the aggregate that made the most noise. <br /> <br />For the sake of comparison he called attention to a recent application filed by Eugene Sand and Gravel. <br />He said the Delta application was completely different than that application. He reiterated the Delta had <br />coexisted with residential neighbors without complaint for 80 years. <br /> <br />Reiterating Planning Director Kent Howe, Mr. Cornacchia noted that in 1996 LCDC decided that it was <br />time to adopt rules for the siting of aggregate resources because of the significant opposition, concerns, <br />and arbitrary decision making by the appropriate bodies. He said th~ new administrative mles were <br />intended to create a system of objective criteria, demonstration and evidence. He acknowledged that every <br />quarry application had faced opposition from nearby land owners. He stressed that applications.were not a <br />popularity contest but were instead a balance between the significant need for aggregate products and the <br />land uses adjacent to quarries. He explained that the established standards and ~equirements contained <br />methodologies for minimizing potential conflicts. <br /> <br />Mr. Cornacchia said if the company demonstrated that it met the established standards for-noise and dust <br />emanations then it had minimized any potential impacts. He said the noise study had divided the property <br />into zones which required the company to do certain things to minimize nQise in each of those zones. He <br />said the company extraction operations occur below ground level and stressed that this lessened noise from <br />the site. He said, because of concerns raised by nearby residents a noise study had been. conducted at a <br />new residential subdivision that was significantly further away than houses abutting the quarry site. This <br />additional analysis was submitted into the record. <br /> <br />Mr. Cornacchia cited the staffreport stating that there was a significant resource of gravel on the site. He <br />said the analysis had determined that there was over 9 million tons. of aggregate on the site.. He noted that <br />2 million tons was the standard th~t determined significance of aggregate resources-. <br /> <br />Mr. Cornacchia noted that the noise criteria enforced by DEQ stated that when a mine site was expanded <br />onto a contiguous property the noise criteria that applied to the equipment in the old area - also applied in <br />the new area. He said this was a lesser standard thanjudging what noise would be on a new site. He said <br />Delta had chosen to submit itself to the higher standards of noise mitigation. He said the higher standards . <br />required an analySis of ambient noise levels in addition to the decibel levels that occurred on the edges of <br />the property and the noise study did include that. <br /> <br />Going back to dust, Mr. Cornacchia said Delta had complied with all dust regulations for 80 years. He <br />noted that the standards for what the company had to do to be in compliance was mcluded in the written <br /> <br />- MINUTES-Lane County Planning Commission <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br />- . .November 15,-2005 <br /> <br />-Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.