Laserfiche WebLink
LC 12.225 Metro Plan Approval of a Plan Amendment. [Eugene Code 9.7715] <br /> (b) Type II. (ii) Between the City Limits and Plan Boundary. To become effective, a Metro Plan <br />Type II amendment between the city limits and the Plan Boundary must be approved by the Home City <br />and Lane County. Exception: If the non-home City, after referral of the proposal, determines that the <br />amendment has Regional Impact, and, as a result of that determination, chooses to participate in the <br />hearing, all three governing bodies must approve the amendment. <br />See Attachment 4 for the Public Notice & Referral sent to City of Springfield in November 2005 and <br />their response, which was considered by Springfield City Council for determination of any regional <br />impact on November 4, 2005. Springfield chose not to participate in the hearings at this time, leaving <br />Eugene and Lane County to conduct the two jurisdiction approval process. <br /> <br />Metro Plan Amendment Criteria <br /> <br /> LC 12.225 (2) Criteria for Approval of Plan Amendment. [Eugene Code 9.7730(3)] <br /> The following criteria shall be applied by the Board of Commissioners in approving or denying a plan <br />amendment application: <br /> (a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted <br /> by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and <br /> (b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. <br /> <br />Review for conformance with the Statewide Planning Goals and the Oregon Administrative Rules <br />occurs later in this report. Lane County and the City of Eugene are required to comply with the Oregon <br />Administrative Rules (OAR’s) that implement the Statewide Planning Goals. Metro Plan Policy is <br />implemented by identifying significant aggregate Goal 5 sites as Sand & Gravel Resources by Plan <br />Designation and the appropriate zoning pursuant to the Goal 5 Rule. <br /> <br />OAR 660-023-180(2): “Local governments are not required to amend acknowledged inventories or <br />plans with regard to mineral and aggregate resources except in response to an application for a <br />PAPA, or at periodic review as specified in Section (9) of this rule. <br /> <br />This proposal is a request for a Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA) to add this site to the <br />significant Mineral & Aggregate Resource Inventory. The property owner submitted the application as <br />a PAPA in August 2005. <br /> <br /> <br />D. Analysis <br /> <br /> Lane County is required to amend the acknowledged mineral and aggregate inventory in response to <br />this application for a Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA). The Rule evaluation criteria <br />for a PAPA are separated into seven analytical steps for this project: <br /> <br />Step 1. Determine if the PAPA information is adequate. <br />Step 2. Determine if the resource site is significant. <br />Step 3. Determine if conflicts from mining can be minimized. <br />Step 4. Weigh the ESEE consequences of un-minimized conflicts and determine whether to allow <br />mining. <br />Step 5. Determine the ESEE consequences of potential new conflicting uses within the impact area. <br />Step 6. Determine if the rezoning requirements of LC16.252 are met, and if the variance setback <br />request should be granted under LC 16.271(7). Only the Board will consider and make the <br />Board/Council Hearing – Ordinance No. PA 1238 Delta Sand & Gravel Expansion <br />Agenda Cover Memo <br />Page 5 of 23 <br /> <br />