My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/01/06 JEO Meeting
>
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:50 PM
Creation date
10/26/2006 8:42:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Staff Memo
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/1/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Belcher noted that Mr. Christianson had testified that there would be no more than a 1-3 cubic foot capacity for <br />ground water in a 10 foot deep range and that this was a very small figure.when compared with the foot per second <br />measurement for surface flood water. He questioned how Ms. Kupillas would respond to that. <br /> <br />Ms. Kupillas said she envisioned a bath tub and how much water it would hold with or ~ithout being filled with <br />marbles. She said the issue was not flood waters coming from surface water but the water table coming up high <br />enough to reach the surface. <br /> <br />In response t6 a question from Ms. Nichols regarding the water from people's wells that seeped into the excavation <br />would then be pumped into the Willamette River and could not be given back to those who lost water, Ms. Kupillas <br />said the current plan was to pump water into settling ponds and then let it filter into the Willamette River. She said <br />she had worked with other situations where mining operations had affected wells and water had been given back to <br />farmers but remarked that this only worked for irrigation and not for drinking water. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Eugene Planning Commission Member Rick Duncan regarding whether there was a <br />significant change in ground water levels because of.the new excavation that had not already occurred with the . <br />current pit, Ms. Kupillas said there had already been a change in ground water with the existing pit. She said the <br />plan is for expansion to a new area that would be closer to that impacted land. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Duncan regarding whether there would be a reduction in problems as the pit was <br />reclaimed, Ms. Kupillas acknowledged that there could be but surmised that if the materials used to fill the pit were <br />· lower permeability then there would be lower water storage capacity for ground water. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Duncan regarding whether in the long run (20-30 years), when the pit was <br />eventually filled in and whether the ground water would then stabilize itself, Ms. Kupillas said the ground water <br />would be stabilized at a new equilibrium. She speculated that the pit would be reclaimed with lower permeability <br />soils and create a draw down cone of depression. She said the closer a well came to the lower permeable soils there <br />would be well interference issues. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Belcher regarding if the application were approved and whether at the end of the <br />mining process the low permeability barrier should be left or removed as part of the mitigation process, Ms. <br />Kupillas said it would make sense in the interests of ecology to leave it. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan commented that much of the testimony provided by Ms. Kupillas was based on the applicant's 'lack of <br />good science.' He questioned whether it was her opinion that, the matter could be addressed if the correct <br />procedures were taken. <br /> <br />Ms. Kupillas said she was not able to complete the evaluation of impacts that could happen because of lack of <br />information in the application. She said she could say whether everything would be fine if proper procedures were <br />followed, but not enough information was supplied by the applicant. <br /> <br />Lane County Planning. Commissioner Juanita Kirkham noted that the commission needed a vote to proceed in a <br />meeting past 10 pm. <br /> <br />Ms. Arkin, seconded by Lane County PlanningCommissio~er Ed Becker, moved to extend the <br />meeting until no. later than i 1 pm. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />MINUTES-Lane County Planning Commission. <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br />. .January 17,2006 <br /> <br />.13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.