My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
05-10-2017
>
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 4:21:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/10/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
5/10/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />05",)# %.'!'%-%.4 !30%#4 /& 4(% 2!),2/!$ 15)%4 :/.% 02/0/3!, <br />Implicit in the <br />discussions of safety measures at railroad crossings in the downtown and Whiteaker areas and <br />options for funding the construction of safety measures. The public outreach initiatives and <br />engagement findings are detailed below. <br /> <br />0±®µ¨£¨¦ )¥®±¬ ³¨® ³® ³§¤ 0´¡«¨¢ <br />²¤¤ !¯¯¤£¨· ! <br />The foundation of the public outreach process is a public outreach plan (). This plan <br />was reviewed and refined early on by the RRQZ Citizen Advisory Panel and again prior to the <br />initiation of stakeholder meetings. Five outreach goals were established: the public and elected <br />officials have accurate information upon which to base opinions and decision-making; authentic <br />listening sessions and other public involvement mechanisms ensure that staff and decision-makers <br />have heard all ideas; citizen advisory panel members are comfortable with their role in the public <br />engagement process; key stakeholders feel they have reasonable engagement opportunities; and <br />awareness is increased about the preferred options for safety measures at the various crossings <br />and the costs associated with the preferred safety options. <br /> <br />Information has been provided through a number of channels: a web site (www.eugene- <br />or.gov/quietzone) was established and received more than 3,700 page views from Nov. 1, 2015, <br />through June 30, 2016. A fact sheet was written and distributed at all stakeholder meetings and <br />posted on the web. A short video was created and posted to the web and sent out via Facebook and <br />Twitter. Local media also helped convey information to a broad audience. Media coverage included <br />at least four television news stories over the past year plus at least five stories and an editorial in <br />the Register-Guard, an editorial comment in Eugene Weekly, and 10 letters to the editor. <br /> <br />Perhaps most significantly, the citizen advisory panel was formed and numerous stakeholder <br />meetings were held. While these meetings were designed primarily to receive input, a considerable <br />amount of information was provided to participants. The information included in-depth <br />explanations of various safety measures at specific locations, detailed discussions about financing <br />options, and presentations on the process, legal authorities and timelines involved in forming a <br />railroad quiet zone. <br /> <br />2¤¢¤¨µ¨¦ &¤¤£¡ ¢ª ¥±®¬ ³§¤ 0´¡«¨¢ <br />Eugene Public Works formed the 11-person citizen advisory panel to provide input on the proposed <br />RRQZ. The panel was charged with providing a recommendation to Public Works staff and the City <br />Council for supplemental safety measures each crossing in the rail corridor between Hilyard Street <br />and Van Buren Street, and also providing a recommendation for funding supplemental safety <br />measures. The panel met seven times between November 2015 and November 2016. Details about <br />the panel membership and meeting notes can be found at www.eugene-or.gov/3136/RRQZ-Citizen- <br />Advisory-Panel. <br /> <br />²¤¤ !¯¯¤£¨· <br />In addition to the advisory panel, City staff met with more than 20 property owners ( <br />B <br />), many of them businesses adjacent to or near the rail crossings. Those meetings, educational in <br />nature, allowed the interested parties the opportunity to express their opinions about the proposal. <br />The feedback received from these meetings was shared with the citizen advisory panel and helped <br />inform technical decisions about the feasibility of safety improvements at specific locations. <br /> <br />City staff also met with nine stakeholder groups including neighborhood groups, business <br />²¤¤ !¯¯¤£¨· # <br />associations and advocacy groups (). Discussions included an informative <br /> 13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.