My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
05-10-2017
>
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 4:21:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/10/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
5/10/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />listening to the concerns of the homeless and trying to find workable solutions within the <br />context of the quiet zone safety project. <br />3¢®¯¤ ®¥ ¯±®©¤¢³ <br /> Staff has received requests from residents in the River Road/Santa Clara <br />area to expand the quiet zone to include the Irving, Irvington and Awbrey crossings. Lane <br />County has jurisdictional authority for all three of these crossings. However, several of the <br />people in this area are city residents and feel they should be included in the current effort to <br />establish a quiet zone in the 10 downtown and Whiteaker crossings. Their offer to help pay <br />for the safety improvements at these crossings raises a tax policy equity question: is it fair <br />to directly assess some property owners, but not all, for a certain type of improvement? <br /> <br />4", $%&).)4)/.3 <br /> <br />3®¢¨ « %°´¨³¸ Ȩ3®¢ȩ ȃ <br />How might a proposal or action affect the ability to meet basic human <br />needs? How could it influence cultural expression, community relationships, effective <br />government, safety and personal security needs, and neighborhood and stakeholder <br />commitment and stewardship? Are there potential inequities for specific groups of people, <br />and how are those addressed? Have all voices been heard? <br />%µ¨±®¬¤³ « (¤ «³§ Ȩ%µȩ ȃ <br />How could a proposal or action affect environmental health <br />and our ability to effectively address climate uncertainties? Does it prevent pollution? What <br />the possible impacts for air, soil and water? How might it affect how our community looks? <br />%¢®®¬¨¢ 0±®²¯¤±¨³¸ Ȩ%¢®ȩ ȃ <br />How would an action or proposal affect the local economy <br />and what are its costs to the community, now and over the long term? How does the <br />%¢®®¬¨¢ <br />proposal or action support responsible stewardship of public resources? <br />prosperity <br /> considers the effect on the local economy, costs to the community (including <br />long-term costs) and responsible stewardship of public resources. The analysis looked at <br />four factors in this category: development opportunities; impacts on businesses directly <br />affected by the project; the overall cost of the project (including long-term operation and <br />maintenance costs); and the options for funding the project. <br /> <br /> 30 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.