My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO
>
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 11:20:13 AM
Creation date
4/14/2005 4:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/19/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Becker asked if the motion reflected certainty that the applicable criteria had been <br />satisfied. Commissioner Herbert replied that it did. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin expressed appreciation for comments from staffand elected officials and supported <br />the concept of increasing taxes to support public services. She was hesitant to vote affirmatively only <br />because she felt more time was needed to discuss the implications to assure that the language was <br />appropriate to the commission's intentions. <br /> <br /> The motion failed,, 5:3; commissioners Betz, Esty, and Herbert voting in <br /> favor. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Carmichael moved, seconded by Commissioner Siekiel- <br /> Zdzk/nicki, that the Lane County Planning Commission extend the <br /> deadline for public comment for seven days and reevaluate the matter at <br /> its next meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Siekiel-Zdzienicki stated that he always voted for taxes as taxes operated the government. <br /> <br />Commissioner Herbert said he did not perceive a negative vote on his motion as being against the <br />proposal; he was sensitive to the need to move forward with the matter given the number of jurisdictions <br />that would need to be involved. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 7:1; Commissioner Betz voting in opposition. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Beyer moved, seconded by Commissioner Decker, that <br /> the Springfield Planning Commission leave the public record open for <br /> seven days and take up the item at a future meeting. The motion passed, <br /> 5:0. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Belcher moved, seconded by Commissioner Duncan, that <br /> the Eugene Planning Commission leave the public record open for seven <br /> days and work with staffto schedule deliberation of the matter on a <br /> future agenda. <br /> <br />Commissioner Duncan thanked staff for the information provided to the commission. He said that the <br />language of the proposal would be reviewed to assure it was acceptable to .Eugene's elected officials, <br />which was why additional time had been requested. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 4:1; Commissioner Hudspeth voting in opposition. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Kirkham adjourned the joint public hearing. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Moe adjourned the meeting of the Springfield Planning Commission at 8:25 p.m. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Lawless adjourned the meeting of the Eugene Planning Commission at 8:25 p.m. <br /> <br /> (Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> m:12OOS~joint meetings~planning commissions~jtpcphO 502O l. doc <br /> <br /> MINUTES-Joint Planning Commission Public Hearing February 1, 2004 Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.