08/09/1937 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r- 628 . _r_ _ ---.-. - - -. .. - . ~ .-----. - - ~ - -- . ,- -.. ' - GENERAL FUND (Continued) .....,.. Office Machinery & Supply Company 1.00 I """ ." Eugene ~ater Board 1.57 ..~ . -t.~/ "~..(J Henry Tymer Company, Inc. 3.52 11 Natron Printing Company 20.50 S. B. Finegan Auto Parts .25 ~ Hanson Blue Print Company, Inc. 20.93 Castelloe & S'tocker'Electric 108.6.6 Eugene ~ater Board 80.56 Eugene Water Board 2.40 Western States Grocery Company 2.85 ,Granzer 's Grol~ery .25 Baker's Pharmacy 1.75 E. D. Furrer, M. D. 35.00 Eugene Water Board 5.51 Callahan Furniture Company 23.30 American Police Review 1.00 Shelton-Turnbull Company 13.00 C. A. Svmrts,. Sheriff 31.00 Ludford's .25 Silva Chevrolet Company .12 Eugene ~Na ter Bos.rd 2363.45 Firestone Service Stores ..50 State Industrlal Commission 165.05 Eugene ~ater Board 83.54 Eugene Chemical VJorks 5.00 Williams' Bakery 2..95 Eugene Public Library 654.17 J. H. MacDonald Lumber Company 5.13 Eugene \'I}a ter Board 10.95 Ii1arvin G. Kelso 98..70 Shank Brother:::; Garbage 1.00 Eugene Mill & Elevator Company 13.94 Chase Company 2.35 11 The Brund Saw Shop .50 The Eugene Ne'/Ils 2.97 Veltum's Machine Shop 4..70 R. .R. Babb Ha:~dVJare Co. 17.59 Vants Distributing Company 30.46 Carlson, Hatton & Hay, Inc. 36.62 C. P. Tillman Company .50 Cressey's 7.45 Twin Oaks Builders Supply Company 15.65 Elliott Implement & Seed 5.45 Mahlon E. Sweet 1.35 Eugene Water 30ard 6.13 Standard Oil Company of California 46.20 Eugene Hardwa:re Company 5.00 Preston & Hales 1.20 Oregon Supply Company 56.62 NordlingfParts Company 1.57 Pacific Tel a:1d Tel Co. 16..88 Midgley Planing Mill Company 7.90 Staley & Turn':mll 9.''(5 Lane County 9.85 The Texas Com~any 349.80 George A. Halton Company 8.56 F. Wentworth, Treasurer 278.00 Councilman Farrington stated that investigations h~d been made on the so- called established woodyards in various localities of the ,~ity and that .he had no I report to make on them. He said that he could not conscie::1tiously state that they constituted a nuisance. He recommended that no action be taken until petitions are 16 received voicing protests.. / The Recorder presented a petition asking that the woodyard at 1791 Jef- ferson Street on the property of Zada McDonald, operated by McDonald Brothers, be declared a nuisance and removed from the vicinity. The Re~order pointed out that as far as records revealed that the party in question had not secured a license 17 jl for the establishment of a woodyard or to practice the occupation of, woodsawing. The Chief of Police was asked to investigate. I II I It seemed to be the opinion of the councilmen that woodyards should be con- demned. Mr. Calkins, City Attorney, was questioned. The ;natter rested here until 18 discussion at the next meeting. / At this time Councilman Hendershott reported that 'William Madaugh had ex- 19 I tended through him a formal invitation, to Mayor Large, the councilmen and all city officials to attend the Route F Picnic.. / I The City Recorder reported upon the mailing of statements to parties re- . I ceiving services by the fire department beyond the city limits. He stated that Ij certified copies of reports on file in the fire department office were obtained and billed on the basis of $25.00 for the call including service the first hour II and ~15.00 per hour for each succeeding hour thereafter or fraction thereof. A sample of the letters mailed out to the various pIaces was read. He wished to I further report that the Lewis Lumber Company has asked for a further explanation an a reply had been made. At the present time no letter had 'been received. The Southern Pacific Company gave notice that a voucher had been prepared and would be I mailed in the near future. Broder Brothers stated that the bill was unjust and I! wanted to be relieved of the same. Mr. James O. Bettis ani the proprietor of Charles' Hatchery were both in the office and stated that the charge was proper but that if the same had been brought to their attention at the time of the fire, the Insurance Company would have taken care of it. But, if the council still felt that they should be paid, they would settle with the city. The Recorder furthe~ I reported that the Fire Department had written 13 letters ta cities of the state inquiring about their method of handling out-of-town calls. The replies were divided as follows: (1) Those making no charge at all; (2) Those making charges, the prices varying, depending on the mileage and the amount of apparatus in use; (3) no calls at all and another no calls except to adjacent cities and still another makes industrial calls only with no charge. The Recorder stated that a communication had been received from the State Industrial:~ccident Commission con- cerning protection of Fire Department when on out-or-town calls with fire equipment and inhalator and it was learned that firemen ,are fully pratected at all times when on duty. The Recorder raised the question as to what should be done in the matter .. ~