My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/14/05 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 02/14/05 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:30 AM
Creation date
4/22/2005 2:38:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
perhaps expanding the scope so it was more available. He said if the increasing costs were passed on to <br />small businesses, soon everyone would be working at Wal-Mart. <br /> <br />Tim Higgins, 1796 Willamette Street, said his petroleum business was currently regulated by the EPA, <br />DEQ, the State Fire Marshal, and the Department of Agriculture. He said operators had to be licensed and <br />certified by the State prior to being able to operate underground storage tanks. He said the new regulations <br />were redundant. He stated that the proposed ordinance would have no effect on reducing emissions in the <br />petroleum industry, noting that implementing Stage 1 and Stage 2 recovery efforts were the only ways to <br />reduce emissions. Mr. Higgins said he recently spent about $450,000 upgrading his company's facility, <br />with no financial assistance from the oil companies, and said there was no money left. When he was <br />growing up, there were over 200 gas stations in Eugene and Springfield, and today there were 28 to 30. <br />Within five years, he said only 15 or 20 stations operated by the big conglomerates would remain, and <br />petroleum distribution in Eugene would be controlled by four or five people. He asserted that there was <br />nothing the City could do that would compare to what the DEQ would put his company through during an <br />upcoming six-hour inspection. He said the council was in over its head, and did not have a clue about the <br />environmental regulations and equipment at a simple site. His 86-year-old father had breathed gasoline <br />fumes his entire life and had no side effects, and his children had spent considerable time at the gas station <br />with no ill effects. He did not know of anyone personally who had a side effect from petroleum fumes. He <br />acknowledged that some people had health problems, but a small, noisy minority supported the ordinance. <br />He concluded that most people do not care about the Toxics Right-to-Know Program. <br /> <br />Mark Robinowitz, 28549 Sutherlin Lane, said he knew many people who had cancer and other health <br />problems from the sorts of substances covered by the Toxics Right to Know ordinance. He asserted that the <br />real issue was prevention. He noted that the toxic plume under the railroad was caused by a chlorinated <br />solvent when a non-toxic alternative could have been used. Mr. Robinowitz said an article about green <br />building technologies and wafer board made without formaldehyde appeared in a recent edition of Home <br />Power Magazine published in Ashland. He noted that formaldehyde was the number one toxin in the air in <br />Lane County, and that there were nontoxic alternatives. He asserted that medical costs resulting to toxic <br />exposures were shifted to the public. He expressed concern about toxic substances transported via rail. <br /> <br /> Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved that the meeting be extended to <br /> 10:20 p.m. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mara Wile, 3470 High Street, supported the Toxics Right-to-Know Program. She said that exposure to <br />chemicals could lead to serious health issues. She stated that had that fact been known in the past, her River <br />Road area home would not be sitting next to a toxic plume. She said if businesses were bringing toxic <br />chemicals into the community, the community was entitled to the details. She did not see the much- <br />publicized commotion that Eugene was not friendly to businesses. Her research for a new office location for <br />her company in Santa Fe, Durango, Berkeley, and Boise demonstrated that those areas had more taxes, more <br />forms, more licensing, and more requirements than did Eugene. She said chemicals had benefits but there <br />should be correlating costs, asserting that the cost of the program was minimal, and the community deserved <br />the right to know. She objected to The Register-Guard's contention that the website was used very little, <br />when she found the website to be very helpful. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 14, 2005 Page 18 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.