Laserfiche WebLink
and infrastructure in Lane County. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor indicated her opposition to the motion, saying it was ;;worse than the other one." <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed with Ms. Taylor. She said that the motion formalized the commitment mentioned in the <br />first motion. She believed the proposal would result in a structure similar to that of the Metropolitan Policy <br />Committee (MPC), which she maintained was a multi-jurisdictional body that had taken away decision- <br />making authority from local elected governments. She further objected to the proposal that the members <br />would be appointed rather than elected. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that if the motion ~felt like the son of MPC" he would oppose it. The motion did not call for <br />the formation of a permanent body, but rather a working group to decide what a permanent body would look <br />like. Before a permanent body could be formed, the council would have to approve Eugene's participation. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 6:2; Ms. Bettman and Ms. Taylor voting no. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 28, 2005 Page 12 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />