My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20581
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2017 No. 20572 - 20587
>
Ordinance No. 20581
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2017 4:24:08 PM
Creation date
8/4/2017 4:24:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20581
Document_Title
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING UTILITY SERVICE TO SUPPORT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
Adopted_Date
5/22/2017
Approved Date
5/23/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
6/23/2017
Signer
Vinis
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Exhibit B <br /> <br /> <br />Legislative Findings: <br />Economic Development in the Industrial Corridor <br /> (City File CA 17-2) <br /> <br />Overview <br />The goal of this City-initiated land use code amendment is to help facilitate economic development <br /> <br />The area is represented by the Industrial Corridor Community Organizatiis a non- <br />profit, formally recognized community organization. The ICCO boundary is generally the large <br />triangle of land lying between the Northwest Expressway on the east and the Urban Growth <br />Boundary (UGB) on the west (see map included as Exhibit A to the ordinance). <br /> <br />Most of the property within the ICCO area is zoned and designated for industrial uses. The ICCO area <br />includes many large parcels, some developed by local legacy industries, some undeveloped, and <br />some under-developed. The ICCO area includes about 1,652 acres, approximately 96% of which is <br />zoned industrial (38% Heavy Industrial/I-3, and 59% Light-Medium Industrial/I-2). Proximity to <br />highways, railroad, and airport make the area highly-conducive to industrial uses. At the same time, <br />there are development challenges associated with current policies and land use code requirements, <br />availability of urban services such as sanitary sewer, and lack of contiguity with City limits for a large <br />portion of the area. Consistent with the goals and objectives of the Metro Plan and Regional <br />Economic Prosperity Plan, encouraging development and redevelopment within the ICCO area has <br />the potential to create highly-desirable manufacturing jobs within local key industries. <br /> <br />Most of the area is outside the City limits of Eugene and does not have access to the full range of <br />urban services such as sanitary sewer, stormwater drainage, police, and fire protection. Much of the <br />area receives its necessary services through special districts, and may need on-site sewage disposal <br />systems, until such time as individual properties are annexed to the City. In accordance with state <br />and federal laws, as well as the Metro Plan and land use code, properties seeking development on <br />these lands in most cases require connectsewer system and provision of other urban <br />services by the City of Eugene. The Metro Plan anticipates that all lands within the UGB will <br />eventually be annexed and served by the City. However, the lack of certain urban services like <br />sanitary sewer, and the lack of contiguity with City limits, has hindered the ability for many properties <br />to annex in the near term. <br /> <br />Property outside the City but inside the UGB (as is the majority of the ICCO area) was previously able <br />to annex even if the property was not contiguous to City limits, provided that the Lane County <br />Boundary Commission approved the request. However, with the abolishment of the Boundary <br />Commission by the Legislature in 2008, annexations must now be contiguous to city limits. In <br />addition to making it difficult to develop unless property first annexed, these changes also have the <br />effect of precluding non-contiguous annexations, which in turn prevents the annexation of individual <br />properties in the majority of the ICCO area. These changes occurred prior to the beginning of the <br />recent recession. With development activity picking up again over the last several years, the policy <br />question about whether to allow annexation agreements, rather than immediate annexation, <br />warrants consideration by Council. In several cases, property owners have been unable to proceed <br /> <br />Findings - 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.