Laserfiche WebLink
not do so. He related that he had produced several public service announcements for LCARA and had seen <br />the pile of dead dogs and cats after routine euthanizations. He felt many of them could have been someone's <br />pets. He said the ordinance would be a great first step in reuniting animals with their owners. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked everyone for testifying. She was glad to support the ordinance. She fek animals in <br />the City were underserved. She hoped more people would take advantage of licensing their dogs. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor said she loved her dog and would not consider having a dog that was not licensed. She <br />related that some people were concerned that with access to more money animal control officers would do <br />more patrolling and issue more tickets. She said her "big concern" was that animal control officers would <br />drive around neighborhoods and this was not good for the environment and not a good use of money. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling reiterated that the council was not prepared to take action until March 7. He asked if it <br />would be possible to include language that would take five percent of the fee and place it into low-cost spay <br />and neuter procedures. Ms. Pomes responded that the City operated the Low-Cost Spay and Neuter Clinic <br />and that Lane County applied five percent of its license fees and the City put two percent of its licensing <br />revenues into low-income certificates for spay and neuter services. <br /> <br />6. ACTION: <br /> An Ordinance Concerning Motorized Transportation Devices and Motor Assisted Scooter Sales; <br /> Amending Sections 4.990, 5.010, and 5.990 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and Adding new Sections <br /> 4.979 and 5.160 to that Code <br /> <br /> Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved that the City <br /> Council adopt Council Bill 4892, an ordinance concerning motorized <br /> transportation devices and motor assisted scooter sales. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly wished to know the current park rules and whether it was a problem for mobility-impaired <br />people, for which there was a broad exemption in the rules governing bicycle paths, to travel through a park <br />to get to the bike path using a motorized transportation device. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Kelly, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to direct the City <br /> Manger to do a preliminary list of key transportation corridors that lack <br /> on-street bike lanes and thereby limit the mobility of motorized scooters. <br /> The list would be brought to the City Council with a rough scope of work, <br /> including rough dollar costs, to create such lanes. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked for clarification on what was meant by transportation corridors. Councilor <br />Kelly replied that he used that terminology because that was the terminology he heard transportation <br />planners use. He felt professionals who understood where people started out and tended to go would be able <br />to conduct such an analysis. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 28, 2005 Page 11 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />