Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Kelly indicated he had also submitted corrections to the minutes via email. Councilor Poling <br />deemed the corrections, without objection, approved. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the <br /> exception of Item C, passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor stated that the councilors had copies of an e-mail with a proposed amendment to <br />include all public buildings in the smoking ordinance. <br /> <br /> Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend <br /> subsection (2)(k) of Section 6.230 of the proposed ordinance by removing <br /> the proposed deletion of the words ~publicly owned' and deleting the <br /> proposed phrase Gowned by the City,' both occurring in the first line of that <br /> subsection, deleting the remaining proposed revisions to subsection (2) and <br /> revising the lead sentence of subsection (2) accordingly. Roll call vote; the <br /> amendment passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt Item C <br /> as amended. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING and POSSIBLE ACTION: FY06-FYll Draft Capital Improvement <br /> Program <br /> <br />Councilor Poling stated that no action would be taken on this item at Councilor Papa's request. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor explained that this was the public hearing on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that <br />had been discussed by the Budget Committee. He asked Patty Boyle, Senior Management Analyst for the <br />Finance and Court Services Division of the Central Services Department to speak to the CIP. <br /> <br />Ms. Boyle said the CIP was developed by compiling the capital projects found in adopted long-range plans <br />and in the context of the City's long-range goals and policies. She further explained that the CIP was a <br />planning document that provided policy-makers with a view of the anticipated capital investment in the <br />City's infrastructure over the next six years and that it also acted as a basis for the proposed capital budget, <br />though it did not authorize the spending of any funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Boyle stated that copies of the CIP were posted to the Web site and were distributed to the chairs of all <br />of the neighborhood associations, as well as the Planning Commission, the Budget Committee, and all <br />interested parties. She noted that an opportunity to have a staff presentation on the CIP had been made to <br />all neighborhood associations and opportunities to comment on the CIP were advertised in The Register- <br />Guard and the Eugene Weekly. All public testimony was included in the council material packets for the <br />current meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Boyle pointed out that both the Planning Commission and the Budget Committee had completed their <br />review of the CIP and had recommended approval of it with amendments. She encouraged the council to <br />identify any questions that might arise so that they could be adequately addressed prior to action on the item, <br />now scheduled for March 7. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 28, 2005 Page 6 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />