Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Solomon asked, in the spirit of compromise, that the council ask the City Manager and not the <br />Toxics Board to come back to the council with a process that would arrive at the answers the council <br />sought. She pointed out the ordinance that was proposed for action was the result of the Toxics Board <br />process. She opined that the Toxics Board was an artificially balanced body, as demonstrated by its <br />frequent near-tie votes. <br /> <br /> Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to amend Councilor Kelly's <br /> motion to substitute ;City Manager' for the ;Toxics Board.' <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked if the Toxics Board had, under the City Charter, the authority to take that action. <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein replied that the council had the authority to ask the Toxics Board to undertake <br />the work dictated in Councilor Kelly's motion. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor stated, given that the Toxics Board members were experts on the subject matter, that <br />any process he would bring back to the council would include consultation with the board in an official way. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor said he would not support any Toxics Program expansion that was not based on some sort <br />of authoritative resources or empirical data. He did not think merely taking input from public testimony and <br />affected businesses provided enough information on which to base a decision. He wanted more complete <br />and precise data before he could consider the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly opposed Councilor Solomon's amendment because he thought that the City Manager would <br />be part of the information loop regardless. He preferred to leave the Toxics Board in charge. He said the <br />Toxics Board had the benefit of the public testimony and that his motion would give them the directive to <br />consult with affected businesses. He thought the Toxics Board also benefited from the work of its lead staff, <br />Glen Potter, management analyst for the Eugene Fire Department. He added that, ultimately, it was up to <br />the City Council to decide whether an expansion of the program should occur. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein affirmed, in response to Councilor Bettman, that the Toxics Board was created by City Charter. <br />Councilor Bettman called the Toxics Board the ~most balanced committee that exists within the City <br />organization." She felt the City benefited from the debate that the Toxics Board had and also from the <br />expertise of the people at the table. She indicated she would not support the amendment. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Pap~, Solomon, and <br /> Poling voting in favor. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked how she could be assured that the Toxics Board would not be the only board <br />reviewing data and weighing in on which businesses should report. City Manager Taylor responded that it <br />was the preference of the City Council that any item that came before the council had a recommendation <br />from the City Manager. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling expressed reservations about the Toxics Board but felt that to move forward he would <br />have to support Councilor Kelly's motion. He agreed with Councilor Pryor regarding a need for more <br />empirical data in order to expand the program. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council March 7, 2005 Page 13 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />