Laserfiche WebLink
8. ACTION: <br /> Ratification of Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Actions of February 11, 2005 <br /> <br /> Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to ratify the actions of the <br /> Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations as set forth in the minutes of February <br /> 11, 2005. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved to authorize City staff to lobby <br /> against any proposed legislation that would weaken or eliminate any of the powers and <br /> responsibilities of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said this would direct staff to take a proactive stance with the legislature should it <br />propose legislation to eliminate the boundary commission, as had been suggested might happen. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon was unclear about the function of the boundary commission. She wanted more <br />information about possible pending legislature, such as whether there was a bill on the table. She noted that <br />Lane County was the last county in the State that still retained a boundary commission. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked Intergovernmental Relations Manager Jason Heuser to speak to the issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser explained that there were no known bills that specifically sought to abolish the boundary <br />commission. However, he thought the likelihood of such a bill being introduced was great. He thought it <br />was in the best interest of the City to preserve the status quo on this subject. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ felt there could be many issues on the horizon and the council should not try to pull bills into <br />the Council Chamber and out of the Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (CCIGR) process. <br />He said he would be more inclined to be proactive if legislation was imminent, but given that this was not <br />the case, he did not feel the need to take it on at the present time. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser stated that the deadline for new bills to be introduced was by 5 p.m. on the present date. He <br />said the legislature would work through the "logjam" of bills and then he would have a greater sense of what <br />bills the City should be aware of. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap~, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to substitute for Councilor <br /> Bettman's motion a motion that dictated that such concerns be handled through the CCIGR <br /> process. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if there was a difference in the strength of lobbying efforts that were only <br />approved by the CCIGR as opposed to those receiving council approval. Mr. Heuser replied that there was <br />not. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman withdrew her motion. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved to authorize City staff to lobby <br /> against any proposed legislation that would weaken or eliminate any of the powers of the <br /> City with respect to the formation or establishment of any special district whose territory <br /> would overlap land within the boundaries of the City or the urban growth boundary. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council March 7, 2005 Page 16 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />