Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~12 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />A COMMUNICATION FROM MR. H. l. PARMENTER, OWNER OF THE CASCADE MOTOR COMPANY - RE: <br />GRID TRAFFIC SYSTEM WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"'tr ' <br />ii <br />EFFECT OF <br /> <br />..... '~i' <br /> <br />"I AM WRITING AS YOU REQUESTED, REGARDING THE EFFECT THE GRID TRAFFIC SYSTEM HAS HAD <br />UPON THE OPERATION OF OUR BUSINESS. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~/Ii:. - ,,; <br /> <br />',~i~;. <br /> <br />c;..? <br /> <br />....... <br /> <br />THE GRID IDEA, AND THE WAY IT OPERATES, REMINDS ME OF THE POLITICIAN WHO WAS ALWAYS <br />TRYING TO DO HIS COUNTRY' FOR SOMETHING. <br /> <br />{'v <br /> <br />LAST APRIL I PURCHASED PROPERTY AT 10TH AND HIGH STREETS WITH EVERY ASSURANCE THAT IT <br />WOULD BE ONE OF THE BETTER BUSINESS PROPERTIES AND THAT ALON~ WITH WIDENING HIGH STREET IT <br />WOULD DEFINITELY REMAIN TWO WAY TRAFFIC. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />TO-DAY WITH THE GRID TRAFFIC SYSTEM WHICH HAS BEEN IMPOSED UPON THE PEOPLE OF EUGENE <br />WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT, THE VALUE OF MY PROPERTY IS NIL AND ABSOLUTELY MUST BE ELIMINATED AS <br />A PART OF OUR OPERATION AT CASCADE MOTOR COMPANY. <br /> <br />WE ARE NOT FINANCIALLY ABLE TO ABSORB A LOSS OF THIS MAGNITUDE AND J DDN"T THINK ANY <br />OTHER BUSINESS COULD OR WOULD. <br /> <br />WE HAVE DISCUSSED THIS SYSTEM WITH MANY PEOPLE AND IN ALMOST EVERY INSTANCE THEY DESCRIBE <br />IT AS UNWORKABLE AND UNSATISFACTORY. IT IS NOT THE ANSWER TO OUR PROBLEM. MORE TRAFFIC <br />LIGHTS AND PROPER TIMING WOULD DO A MUCH BETTER JOB. <br /> <br />IF YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME ONE WAY STREETS WHY NOT HAVE THEM ALL RUNNING THE SAME DIRECTION <br />AND ELIMINATE THE STREETS RUNNING EAST AND WEST, SOUTH OF SEVENTH. <br /> <br />THIS SITUATION IS SERIOUS AND I THINK WE SHOULD BE ADVISED IMMEDIATELY TO WHAT EXTENT <br />THIS IMPOSITION WILL BE CONTINUED." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY ALLEN THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND PLACED-ON <br />FILE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />10 A COMMUNICATION FROM MR. J. P. RUBLE - RE: ALLEY OPENING BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH FROM WEST END <br />OF HALLOCK"S ADDITION TO GARFIELD WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"ON FEBRUARY 12, 1945, THE CITY OF EUGENE BY ORDINANCE NO. 8833 INSTITUTED AN"ALLEY <br />OPENING PROCEDURE BETWEEN SEVENTH AVENUE AND-EIGHTH AVENUE FROM-THE WEST LINE OF HALLOCK~S <br />ADDITION TO GARFIELO-STREET. THE WEST 192.92 FEET ~F THIS ALLEY CROSS THE LAND WHICH AT <br />THAT TIME WAS OWNED BY fRANK AND SARAH SEAL. BETWEEN THAT DATE AND THE DATE THE ENGINEER <br />FILED ,HIS REPORT, fRANK AND SARAH SEAL CONVEYED THiS PROPERTY TO ROBERT H. WILLS, WHO IN <br />TURN CONVEYED THE PROPERTY TO THE VALLEY LAND AND WAREHOUSE COMPANY, A CORPORATION ,IN WHICH <br />MR. WILLS OWNS ALL BUT QUALIFYING SHARES OF STOCK. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />NEITHER MR. WILLS OR THE VALLEY LAND AND WAREHOUSE COMPANY RECEIVED ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OR <br />CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF THE PROCEEDING BY THE COUNCIL FOR THE REASON THAT THE ENGINEER'S <br />REPORT SHOWED fRANK AND SARAH SEAL AS THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY, AS DID THE VARIOUS PUBLI- <br />CATIONS UP UNTIL THE PUBLICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION VI OF THE CHARTER, WHICH PUBLICATION <br />APPEARS NOT TO HAVE BEEN MADE AT ALL~ THE RESULT OF THE CITY M~ILING AND PUBLISHING NOTICES' <br />IN THE NAME OF fRANK AND SARAH SEAL AFTER THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN CONVEYED TO MR. WILLS, AND <br />ITS APPARENT FAILURE TO PUBLISH THE NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION VI, DEPR~VED MR. WILLS OF THE <br />OPPORTUNITY OF ATTENDING THE HEARINGS AND FILING OBJECTIONS TO THE DAMAGE AWARDS AND THE <br />OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL TO THE CIRCUIT COURT WITHIN THE TIME LIMITED BY THE CITY CHARTER. <br /> <br />THE CITY COMPLETED ITS PROCEDURE AND RECORDED ITS RESOLUTION AND PLAT WITH'THE COUNTY <br />CLERK ON DECEMBER 21, 1945. HOWEVER, MR. WILLS, ALTHOUGH CHARGED WITH CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE <br />FROM THIS DATE, DID NOT HAVE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THIS ALLEY UNTIL ABOUT <br />THREE WEEKS AGO, WHEN WORKMEN APPEARED ON THE PREMISES STATING THAT THE CITY HAD THIS ALLEY <br />AND THAT THEY WERE GOING TO LAY A SEWER LINE. IN THE MEANTIME, 'MR. WILLS AND HIS COMPANY, <br />BELIEVING THEIR PROPERTY'EXTENDED TO THE STREET, HAD BUILT A BUILDING, HARD-SURFACED THE <br />LAND AND HAVE SPENT IN EXCESS OF #50,000.00 ON IMPROVEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR A MACHINERY <br />AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND DEALERSHIP BUSINESS. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED ALLEY CROSSES THEIR LAND APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET SOUTH, PARALLEL TO THE HIGH- <br />WAY, AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ALLEY, AS WE UNDERSTAND, IS ABOUT THREE FEET FROM THE FRONT <br />DOOR OF THEIR BUILDING. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />REFERENCE TO THE PLAT OF THIS PARTICULAR SECTION OF EUGENE PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, <br />IDENTIFIED AS fiLE NO. 18-597, REVEALS THAT SEVENTH AVENUE WIOENS FROM APPROXiMATELY 100 <br />FEET IN WIDTH TO APPROXiMATELY 300 FEET IN wIOTH DIRECTLY IN FRONT O~ THE WILL'S PROPERTY <br />SO THAT THE PROPERTY EAST OF HIS HAS USE FOR THIS PROPOSED ALLEY, AND ACCESS TO SEVENTH <br />AVENUE FROM THE ALLEY BY WAY OF A CROSS-CONNECTING STREET APPROXiMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE <br />WILLS' PROPERTY. THE ONLY PURPOSE TO BE SERVED BY AN ALLEY ACROSS THE WILLS" PROPERTY WOULD <br />BE FOR SEWER AND TRANSMiSSION LINES, FOR WHICH AN EASEMENT WILL BE GLADLY GIVEN TO THE CITY <br />WITHOuT COST, FEELING CONFIDENT THAT THERE WOULD BE NO OCCASION AND THAT THE CITY WOULD NOT <br />SET POLES AT INCONVENIENT POINTS, SUCH AS IN FRONT.OF THEIR DOOR. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />