Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />19, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY BOOTH, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT IN THE EVENT THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES <br />NOT ADOPT THE PLAN AND ALLOCATE THE FUNDS THAT THE CITY OF EUGENE PROCEED WITH A FEASIBILITY <br />STUDY INVOLVING THE EUGENE AREA AND THE DISTRICTS IN THE IMMEDIATE PROXIMITY, THE COST OF WHICH <br />IS NOT TO EXCEED THE $4,000.00 AUTHORIZATION. ROLLCALL VOTE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />6 A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS - RE: VARIOUS APPEALS FOR VARIANCE TO ZONING ORDINANCE <br />WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />-A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS WAS HELD AT THE CITY HALL, OCTOBER 21, 1949. <br />THE MEMBERS PRESENT BEING JOHN lUVAAS, ROBERT iILMSEN, AND ADRIAN VAALER. <br /> <br />THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS WERE REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE: <br /> <br />I. REQUEST OF THE LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY TO USE A RESIDENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST , <br />CORNER OF TWENTIETH AVENUE AND UNIVERSITY STREET FOR A FRATERNITY HOUSE WAS RECEIVED <br />BY THE BOARD FOR REVIEW AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY COUNCIL. INTERESTED PARTIES APPEARED I <br />BEFORE THE BOARD TO STATE THEIR CASE; LIKEWISE, PROTESTS FROM THE FOLLOWING PERSONS WERE <br />I <br />CONSIDERED: I <br />I <br />. MR. CHARLES W. INGHAM 2065 UNIVERSITY AVENUE I <br />I 1,'[ MR. SEYMOUR 1136 EAST 20TH AVENUE I~ <br />i MR. SPRINGER 2015 UNIVERSITY <br />:i MR. W. F. G. THATCHER 1992 UNIVERSITY I <br />! , <br />! THESE FOUR PERSONS LIVE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE RESIDENCE PROPOSED TO BE USED AS A I <br />, FRATERNITY HOUSE. i <br />t I <br /> <br />II THE FOLLOWING ARE AT LEAST A BLOCK REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY UNDER DISCUSSION. I <br /> <br />:'1 I <br />I MR. MCKINLEY 2114 UNIVERSITY I' <br />\ MR. JOHNSON 1165 EAST 216T AVENUE <br />,I 2. <br />',,'I MR. J. t. WOODWORTH 1145 EAST 1ST AVENUE I <br />I , <br />I <br />'I FURTHER A LETTER WAS PRESENTED BY MR. & MRS. BUTLER AND ~UPERT KURZRIETER, 1179-1139 I <br />! PEARL STREET, WHO ARE NEIGHBORS OF THE TEMPORARY RESIDENCE OF SAID FRATERNITY. THIS i <br />, LETTER COMMENDS THE DEPORTMENT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE FRATERNITY AND STATES THAT THE ! <br />WRITERS HAVE NOT BEEN CAUSED ANY MAJOR DISTURBANCE OR INCONVENIENCE BY THE FRATERNITY. I <br />t <br />I <br />~ MR. WILMSEN VOTED IN FAVOR OF GRANTING THE REQUEST; MR. lUVAAS AND MR. VAALER VOTED NO. i <br />II THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE BE ADHERED TO AND RELIEF BE GRANTED THE I <br />i PETITIONERS BY REZONING THE PROPERTY TO R-4, MULTIPLE fAMILY, FROM R-I, SINGLE-FAMILY. I' <br />i THE FILE IS ATTACHED HEREWITH. , <br />' I <br />I 2. MR. HOLLISTER OF 1464 JEFFERSON STREET ASKED FOR A REVIEW OF HIS PREVIOUS REQUEST <br />I TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL LIVING QUARTERS IN A SEPARATE BUILDING FOR THE USE OF HIS MOTHER. <br />i <br />'I HE ASKS THAT HE BE PERMITTED TO CONVERT THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE HOBBY SHOP UNDER CONSTRUCTION. <br />" TO LIVING QUARTERS FOR HIS MOTHER, THUS ELIMINATING THE SECOND STORY AS PREVIOUSLY RE- I <br />I ! QUESTED. THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE S,NGLE-FA.,LY ZONE. I <br /> <br />II THE BOARD AGAIN DENIED THE REQUEST. I <br />il I <br />~ 3. MR. f. W. BRUNNER, WHO OWNS PROPERTY AT 1407 RAILROAD BOULEVARD, ASKS FOR A WAIVER i <br />I I <br />" OF SETBACK REQUIREMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED ADDITION TO HIS FOOD-PROCESSING PLANT. I <br />! THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE. THE SETBACK ~EQUIRED IS 27 FEET FROM THE <br />1 CURB LINE. A SURVEY OF EXISTING BUILDINGS SHOWS AN AVERAGE SETBACK OF 22 FEET; THE SET- I <br />;i BACK REQUESTED WAS 21 FEET. I <br /> <br />II ! <br />I J <br />! THE BOARD, CONSIDERING THE AVERAGE SETBACK OF THE OTHER BUILDINGS IN THE BLOCK, VOTED i <br />j TO GRANT MR. BRUNNER'S REQUEST FOR A 21-FOOT SETBACK. I <br /> <br />I 4. PETITION FRO. THE BUILDING CO..'TTEE OF THE CHURCH OF CHRIST LOCATED AT 494 WEST 10TH I <br />II AVENUE, BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON AND 10TH A.VENUE. THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE I <br />I R-3 ZONE. THIS ORGANIZATION DESIRES TO BUILD A NEW CHURCH ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY WHICH <br />I IS 66 FEET X 160 FEET. THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF 50 FEET FROM THE INTERIOR LOT LINES I <br />; MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE BUILDING THEY REQUIRE FOR THEIR NEEDS. THE REAR AND <br />~ FRONT SETBACKS AS PROPOSED ARE SATISFACTORY, THE WEST LINE BEING AN INTERIOR LINE REQUIRES <br />~ A 50 FOOT SETBACK WHICH ELIMINATES ANY POSSIBILITY OF A BUILDING. THE STRUCTURE PROPOSED <br />~I' WOULD BE 52 FEET X 90 FEET IN SIZE, WHICH IS WELL WITHIN THE PERCENT OF LOT COVERAGE PER- <br />i MITTED. THE SETBACK REQUIRED ON WASHINGTON STREET IS 12 FEET; THEREFORE THE SETBACK I <br />j REQUIREMENTS WOULD TAKE OUT 62 FEET OF THE LOT WIDTH LEAVING A 4 FOOT STRIP FOR BUILDING. I <br />~ A LETTER WAS PRESENTED FROM MRS. R. E. GRISWOLD, 468 WEST 10TH AVENUE, AN ADJOINING <br />" PROPERTY OWNER TO THE EAST, WHEREIN SHE OFFERED NO OBJECTIONS TO THE CHURCH BUILDING <br />~ BEING WITHIN THREE FEET OF HER PROPERTY LINE. <br />It <br />III ! THE SOARD DENIED THE REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF THE 50 FOOT SETGACK. <br /> <br />II ! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~. "=""'~'-"""..'--, ," '~"" ., 'o.' .=., ._....~. - .~.. P'_,. "~,..".~~...,',. ... ......... <br />