|
<br />~
<br />85.,
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />TAD C. tUCKEY JR., MAUDE E. lUCKEY & LUCINDA A. DEBuRGH, 814 WILLAMETTE STREET
<br />JOHN Gus RUNGE, 24 W. 8TH AVENUE
<br />HAROLD R. LESTICO, 1591 WILLAMETTE STREET
<br />lEON W. COOLEY AND PATRICIA E. COOLEY, 209 E. 7TH AVENUE
<br />CECIL H. STIREWALT, 42 W. 8TH AVENUE
<br />J. f. WILLIAMS, 34 E. 10TH AVENUE
<br />HERSCHEL P. TAYLOR, PAULINE TAYLOR, RODNEY TAYLOR, LEROY MCDOWELL, 894 E. 13TH AVE.
<br />BIRDIE f. CROUSE, 757 W. 6TH AVE.
<br />B.P.O. ELKS #357, 86 W. 7TH AVE.
<br />I CHAS. S. PRATT & J. M. STICKLEY & BERNARD O'HARE, 685 WILLAMETTE STREET
<br />~ GORDON L. BJERKE, 1711 W. 11TH AVENUE
<br />l lAWRENCE & PEARL DORSEY - 29 W. 11TH AVE.
<br />LESTER LEAVITT, 698 W. 6TH AVE.
<br />i SAFEWAY STORES, 219 W. BROADWAY - NEW LICENSE.
<br />i
<br />II IT WAS MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY HAWN THAT THE APPLICATIONS AS APPROVED BY THE POLICE
<br />! DEPARTMENT BE ENDORSED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />I
<br />
<br />10 ~ THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS TO REZONE WERE SUBMITTED:
<br />:1
<br />,I
<br />, GEORGE W. MILTONBERGER, REZONE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 25TH & HILYARD FROM R-I TO C-2. I
<br />VERA t. WARD, REZONE 1697 RIVERVIEW FROM R-I TO C-2.
<br />I JOHN R. CHAPMAN, REZONE ALL OF LOTS 9 THROUGH 14 INCLUSIVE IN WEST LAWN ADDITION FROM R-A 1
<br />TO R-3.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY HAWN THAT THE PETITIONS BE REFERRED TO THE CITY ATTORNEY
<br />FOR THE NECESSARY RESOLUTIONS AND THEN TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THEIR DECEMBER 6TH MEETING.
<br />MOTION CARRIED. ,
<br />
<br />I I A PETITION SIGNED BY ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS TO ELIMINATE THE CURBING AND PLACE THE SIDE- I
<br />WALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF VAN NESS AGAINST THE CURB WAS SUBMITTED AND READ. THE REPORT OF THE I
<br />ENGINEER SHOWED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS SIGNING THIS PETITION REPRESENTED 55.58% OF THE TOTAL I'
<br />FRONT FOOTAGE OF THE PROPERTIES TO BE ASSESSED.
<br />
<br />i,l IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY GODLOVE THAT THE PETITION BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC "
<br />: I
<br />: WORKS COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br />
<br />12 ~ COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY - RE: ASSESSMENT ON LANE COUNTY PLYWOOD MILLS WAS I
<br />'.1 SUBM I TTED AND READ AS FOLLO\VS: I
<br />I I
<br />~ "THIS IS TO ADVISE THAT I HAVE THIS DATE ATTENDED A MEETING BETWEEN REPRESENTATIVES I
<br />~ OF THE ASSOCIATED PLYWOOD MILLS, SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 52, SCHOOL DISTRICT No.4, LANE !
<br />il COUNTY COURT AND THE CITY OF EUGENE CONCERNING AN ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENT MADE BY LANE COUNTY :
<br />I ON THE ASSOCIATED PLYWOOD MILLS PROPERTY DURING THE YEARS 1945 TO 1948, INCLUSIVE. By i
<br />REASON OF THIS ERRONEOUS ASSESSMENT THE PLYWOOD MILLS PROPERTY WAS INCLUDED WITHIN THE 'I
<br />CITY OF EUGENE AND SCHOOL DISTRICT No.4 WHEN IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN EITHER.
<br />II As A RESULT THE ASSOCIATED PLYWOOD MILLS HAVE FILED A CLAIM WITH LANE COUNTY ASKING THAT I
<br />i APPROXIMATELY $31,000.00 BE REPAID TO THEM BY LANE COUNTY. THIS MONEY WOULD THEN BE
<br />\ COLLECTED FROM SCHOOL DISTRICT No.4 AND THE CITY OF EUGENE. ACTUALLY, THE CLAIM IS FOR I
<br />I APPROXIMATELY 865,000.00, WHICH IS THE AMOUNT THAT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 52 CLAIMS SHOULD BE I
<br />! REFUNDED TO THE ASSOCIATED PLYWOOD MILLS AND WAS PAID TO THEM BECAUSE OF THE ERRONEOUS I
<br />ASSESSMENT. IF t~NE COUNTY RETURNS THE MONEY, THE CITY OF EUGENE WOULD BE FORCED TO PAY',
<br />AS ITS SHARE APPROXIMATELY THE SUM OF $13,740.92. SCHOOL DISTRICT No.4 WOULD PAY $52,480.32~
<br />
<br />I
<br />IT WAS MY POSITION AT THIS MEETING THAT AS YOUR CITY ATTORNEY, I HAO NO AUTHORITY TO I
<br />BIND THE CITY AND THAT IT WOULD BE MY ADVICE TO THE CITY OFFICIALS TO AUTHORIZE NO REPAYMENT
<br />OR DEDUCTIONS FROM TAXES UNTIL THE CITY HAD BEEN PROPERLY AUTHORIZED BY A COURT OF COMPETENT !
<br />JURISDICTION. I
<br />
<br />I WOULD BE PLEASED TO HAVE THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE ME AS TO THE POSITION WHICH THE CITY I
<br />WILL TAKE IN ANY FURTHER CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THIS MATTER." I
<br />
<br />!
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED TO TAKE WHAT- I
<br />EVER ACTION IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE CITY'S INTEREST IN THE MATTER. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br />
<br />13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY - RE: ATTENDANCE AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
<br />MUNICIPAL LAW OFFICERS WAS SUBMITTED. No SPECIFIC ACTION WAS TAKEN ON THE COMMUNICATION BUT I
<br />GENERAL APPROVAL WAS INDI CATED. I
<br />
<br />14 COMMUNICATION FROM RETAIL BUILDING MATERIAL DEALERS - RE: PUBLIC HOUSING WAS SUBMITTED. I
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY CRUMBAKER THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND PLACED I,
<br />ON FILE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />I
<br />
<br />15 COMMUNICATION FROM UNIVERSITY DISTRICT - RE: INVITATION TO ORGANI?E UNIVERSITY DISTRICT I
<br />CLUB OF COMMERCE WAS SUBMITTEO.
<br />
<br />I ' IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY CRUMBAKER THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND PLACED
<br />I ON FILE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />j
<br />!
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />ii""~""",^,.",;,,,,-~,.,. , ,~" ~~,~,''oi,.2''''~''';'''''''c''""""",;,#",,,,~, '.',',..:.....:.,......." ," " ~ ,'''''..,~.., c.,." '~>"~'''~'' "'~="""""~":'''''''''"~"'"'''''''~='''''''""""",""Jk,,,,-,,",....,,", '.,........~
<br />
|