|
<br />::1
<br />
<br />.:6~
<br />1,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />~,i;_~.:';;.=....:..;,,~~,...~,~ '
<br />
<br /> Ii
<br /> !i
<br /> II
<br /> I
<br /> II
<br /> I!
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> Ii
<br /> I!
<br /> II
<br /> i:
<br /> il
<br /> II
<br /> I'
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> Ii
<br />2 II
<br /> II
<br /> ;[
<br /> I.
<br /> I
<br /> Ii
<br /> :1
<br /> II
<br /> it
<br /> Ii
<br /> II
<br /> I
<br /> II
<br /> I,
<br /> II
<br /> !i
<br /> II
<br /> il
<br /> il
<br /> I
<br /> I!
<br /> I
<br /> ii
<br /> 'i
<br /> II
<br /> ,
<br /> ii
<br /> II
<br /> ,I
<br /> il
<br /> Ii
<br /> II
<br /> i1
<br /> 'I
<br /> L
<br /> ii
<br /> I.
<br /> il
<br /> Ii
<br /> :1
<br /> [I
<br /> II
<br /> il
<br /> :i
<br /> Ii
<br /> II
<br /> ;!
<br />3
<br />
<br />i
<br />II
<br />:i
<br />:1
<br />I
<br />:1
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />
<br />.~.j
<br />
<br />SANITARY SEWER ON SUMMIT AVENUE ~ROM rAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD TO HENDRICK'S PARK
<br />
<br />H. C. WERNER, INC.
<br />C. D. JESKE
<br />F. W. RIDDLE
<br />COAST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
<br />
<br />2,100.00
<br />2,048.00
<br />2,473.00
<br />3,005.00
<br />
<br />ALL BIOS WERE ACCOMPANIED BY A CERTI~IED CHECk OR BIDDERS BOND AND WERE IN PROPER ORDER.
<br />CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED THAT THE aiD O~ C. D. JESKE IN THE AMOUNT O~ 82,048.00 BE ACCEPTED.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY €~UUBAKER, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT THE BID O~ C. O. JESKE IN THE SUM O~
<br />82,048.00, BEING THE BEST AND LOWEST BID SUBMITTED, THAT THE PROPER CITY O~FICERS BE INSTRUCTED
<br />TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH C. D. JESKE ~OR THE INSTALLATION O~ A SANITARY SEWER ON SUMMIT
<br />AVENUE ~ROM fAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD TO HENDRICK'S PARK. ROLLCALL VOTE. 'ELLS AND SMITH ABSENT.
<br />MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />REPORTS Of COMMITTEES
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORkS COMMITTEE". RE: VARIOUS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WAS SUBUITTED
<br />AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"A MEETING O~ THE PUBLIC WORkS COMMITTEE WAS HELD ON APRIL 19, 1950 AT 4:00 P.M.
<br />PRESENT WERE CHAIRMAN CRUMBAKER, COUNCILMAN GODLOVE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY ENGINEER.
<br />
<br />THE FOLLOWING NEW IUPROVEUENT PROJECTS WERE APPROVED BY THE COMUITTEE.
<br />
<br />I.
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />3.
<br />
<br />4.
<br />
<br />5.
<br />
<br />6.
<br />
<br />7.
<br />
<br />PAVING POTTER STREET FROU 27TH TO 28TH AVENUE.
<br />PAVING ELINOR STREET ~ROM 27TH TO 28TH AVENUE
<br />PAVING ONYX STREET ~ROU 24TH TO 25TH AVENUE
<br />PAVING 17TH AVENUE FROM WILLAUETTE TO OAk TO 42' WIDTH
<br />SOUT~ IILLAMETTE SEWERS - TOTAL ESTIMATED COST '153,850.00
<br />PAVING 19TH FROM LINCOLN TO rRIENDLY, EXCLUDING CITY PAOPERTY
<br />SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE WASHINGTON FROM 17TH TO 18TH AVENUE
<br />
<br />55%
<br />65.08%
<br />49.56%
<br />74.85%
<br />II "ROJECTS
<br />50.99%
<br />50.00%
<br />
<br />tETTERS AND PETITIONS O~ REMONSTRANCE WERE REVIEWED PERTAINING TO THE ~OLLOWING PETITIONS.
<br />
<br />I. 22ND FROM ALDER TO HAftRIS. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT INASMUCH AS THERE WERE 76.02%
<br />REQUESTING THIS IUPROVEMENT, THAT THE IMPROVEMENT GO AHEAD.
<br />
<br />2. 26TH AVENUE ~ROU GOLUMBIA TO CHULA VISTA. THE LETTER RECEIVED FROM ~ESSRS. 'ARREN
<br />AND PYLE ADVISING THAT THEY DID NOT BELIEVE THE PROJECT WAS WARRANTED AT THIS TIME.
<br />BUT THAT IF IT WENT IN THEY DESIRED ASPHALTIC CEMENT, WAS REVIEWED. MESSRS. IARREN
<br />AND PYLE HAVE AGREED TO GO OVER THE BIDS WITH THE CITY MANAGER IN AN ENDEAVOR TO
<br />ASCERTAIN THE BEST PROCEDURE.
<br />
<br />3. 20TH AVENUE ~ROM ALDER TO HARRIS. A PETITION CONTAINING SEVEN NAMES WAS REVIEWED
<br />OBJECTING TO THE PAVING OF 20TH AVENUE FROM ALDER TO HARRIS. INASMUCH AS THIS SEEMED
<br />TO BE AT LEAST 50% O~ THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THESE TWO BLOCKS IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT
<br />THIS JOB BE HELD UNTIL THE COUNCIL MEETING O~ MAY 8TH-FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION RELATIVE
<br />TO FINAL ACTION.
<br />
<br />A REQUEST FROU MR. C. A. WETTERSHORN TO TRADE LOTS 3 AND 4 FOR lOT I. BLOCK ., VICTORIA
<br />HEIGHTS AODITION WAS REVIEWED. TT~WA8.RECOMMENDED 8Y THE COMMITTEE THAT THE CITY NOT TRADE
<br />THIS LOT TO MR. IETTERSHORN, BUT OF~ER IT FOR SALE ~OR '1,000.00.-
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY CRUUBAKER, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT THE REPORT O~ THE PUBLIC IORkS COMMITTEE
<br />BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ~ROM THE BUDGET COMMITTEE WERE SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />-AT THE FINAL MEETING O~ THE BUDGET COMMITTEE ON APRIL 21 AND A~TER THE ADOPTION OF
<br />THE OPERATING BUDGET THE COMMITTEE GAVE F'ULL DISCUSSION TO THE IMPORTANT SUBJECT O~
<br />STREET CONSTRUCTION. RECONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, WIDENING. ETC. THE COMMITTEE ~EELS WITHOUT
<br />ANY HESITATION THAT AN OVERALL PROGRAM DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE STREET SYSTEM OF' THE CITY
<br />SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN IEGINNING THIS YEAR AND FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT FOUR YEARS FOLLOWING.
<br />
<br />ACCOROINGLY THE BUDGET COMMITTEE PROPOSES TO THE COUNCIL THAT A CHARTER AMENDMENT aE
<br />PREPARED AUTHORIZING A 5 MILL LEVY FOR FIVE YEARS TO .EGIN WITH 1950-51 TO FINANCE STREET
<br />CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, WIDENING, RIGHTS OF' WAY AND, REPAIRING AND DRAINAGE AND THAT
<br />SUCH AMENDMENT BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN JUNE.
<br />
<br />FOLLOWING THE ABOVE -ACTION THE COMMITTEE GAVE FURTHER OISCUSSION TO THE PRO.LEM OF'
<br />~INANCING OUR LOCAL GOVERNUENTS AND TO THE ALARMING INCREASE IN THE OVERALL TAX RATE.
<br />VARIOUS PROPOSALS TO REMEDY THIS SITUATION WERE DISCUSSED AND ANALYZED AND THE lEST
<br />PROPOSAL WAS SOME ~ORU OF' A CITY RETAIL SALES TAX TO ACT A8 AN OF'~8ET TO A PORTION OF THE
<br />CITY PROPERTy TAX.
<br />
<br />...
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />~~~~1
<br />
<br />.J
<br />
<br />..j,...~....."",,-,
<br />
<br />'...;;<0/'1.';;'
<br />
<br />"-d;,";.:~:-,.~~',;;ti~ ''2-"-,,'-;'.'';::.;,,,
<br />
<br />"'~.Ji'",,~'__:~""~_~'C""'"_~-'"'-'::_"""":"'';::'~-';_''_'''''';';._~>.
<br />
<br />.."..."~i.;;.'~'""".;:...~.A;..~-,,
<br />
<br />-c.~}.,.;',;,._~.
<br />
<br />.,:.;~~, ,,*-c
<br />
|