|
<br />:I~r
<br />
<br />17
<br />
<br />II
<br />~ I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />
<br />18
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />20~
<br />
<br />COMMUNICATION FROM TRAILER COURT OPERATORS' ASSOCIATION OF tANE COUNTY - RE: PROPOSED
<br />ORDINANCE REGULATING TRAILER COACHES AND TRAILER HOUSES WITHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE,WAS SUB-
<br />MITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />r
<br />I
<br />
<br />ftTHE TRAILER COURT OPERATORS' ASS'N. OF LANE COUNTY HEREWITH SUBMIT FOR YOUR
<br />CONSIDERATION A PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGULATING TRAILER COACHES AND TRAILER HOUSES
<br />WITHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE AND PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF.
<br />
<br />THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS BASED UPON A SIMILAR ORDINANCE NOW IN EFFECT AT
<br />COTTAGE GROVE, OREGON AND REVIEWED BY OUR ASSOCIATION IN CONNECTION WITH LOCAL AND
<br />STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES INVOLVING THE SANITATION OF THE PRESENT TRAILERS PARKED
<br />WITHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE. '
<br />
<br />THE TRAILER ~OURT GpERATORS' ASS'N. MEETING THURSDAY, MAY 4, 1950 RECOMMENDED. THAT
<br />THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS ATTACHED HERETO BE ADOPTED BY THE CITV OF EUGENE.
<br />
<br />THE ASSOCIATION WILL APPRECIATE YOUR COOPERATION IN THE MATTER.ft
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY HAWN THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND
<br />REFERRED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />COMMUNICATION FROM COLONEL WALSH Of THE ARMY ENGINEERS - RE: AMAZON PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED
<br />
<br />AND READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />,
<br />!,
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />1
<br />II
<br />i!
<br />il
<br />II
<br />I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />f
<br />II
<br />I
<br />:1
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />!I
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />I'
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I[
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />!;
<br />II
<br />i
<br />I
<br />!
<br />
<br />"RErERENCE IS MADE TO OUR CONVERSATION ON MAY 15, 1950 PERTAINING TO THE AUAZON
<br />CREEK IMPROVEMENT. As YOU UNDOUBTEDLY KNOW, OBJECTIONS WERE VOICED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING
<br />HELD AT EUGENE ON JANUARY 24, 1950 BY INTERESTS ALONG THE PROPOSED DIVERSION CHANNEL TO
<br />FERN RIDGE RESERVOIR REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CUSTOMARY PROVISIONS or LOCAL COOPER-
<br />ATION. THE CORPS Of ENGINEERS' PRIMARY INTEREST IN THIS MATTER IS TO INVESTIGATE AND
<br />RECOMMEND A JUSTlrlED AND ACCEPTABLE SOUND ENGINEERING PLAN WHICH WILL COMPLY WITH THE
<br />SPIRIT AND INTENT Of EXISTING LEGISLATION.
<br />
<br />IN THE DEVELOPMENT Or A~Y PROJECT, EXCEPT POSSIBLY THOSE Of AN EXTREMELY LOCAL
<br />NATURE, IT IS EXPECTED THAT SOME OBJECTIONS WILL BE VOICED WHICH MUST BE CONSIDERED
<br />AS TO THE LOCAL EffECT AND THE EFFECT ON THE PROBLEM AS A WHOLE. THE COMPLICATIONS
<br />WHICH HAVE DEVELOPED ON AMAZON CREEK ARE PURELY or A LOCAL NATURE; HOWEVER, THIS OFfICE
<br />IS PLEASED TO BE OF SUCH ASSISTANCE IN FURNISHING INFORMATION THAT MAY. AID IN ARRIVING
<br />AT A SOLUTION.
<br />
<br />THE TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
<br />THE DIVERSION CANAL TO FERN
<br />MAINTENANCE COST Of $3,970.
<br />
<br />Or LOCAL COOPERATION THROUGH THE CITV OF EUGENE, INCLUDING
<br />RIDGE RESERVOIR, IS ESTIMATED AT 8120,100 WITH AN ANNUAL
<br />A BREAKDOWN Or THESE COSTS IS AS rOLLOWS:
<br />
<br /> DIVERSION CANAL
<br />ITEU WITHIN C I TV TO RESERVOIR TOT AL
<br />lANDS AND RIGHTS-Of-WAY 8 6,000 . 8 39,000 8 45,000
<br />RECONSTRUCTION Of UTILITIES
<br />AND B RID GE S 48,200 13,000 61,200
<br />CASH CONTRIBUTION 13,900 0 .1 3,900
<br />TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT 8 68,100 8 52,000 8 I 20 , I 00
<br />ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 2,470 1,500 3,970
<br />
<br />IT IS UN~ERSTOOD THAT THE CITY WOULD BE OUTSIDE ITS JURISDICTION TO OBTAIN LANDS
<br />AND RIGHTS-Or-WAY ALONT THE CANAL BV PURCHAaE OR CONDEMNATION OR TO PHYSICALLY PERfORM
<br />THE RECONSTRUCTION Or UTILITIES AND BRIDGES, ALTHOUGH THIS DIVERSION PORTION Of THE
<br />PROJECT IS NEEDED TO SUPPLEMENT THE UPSTREAM WORK. IT IS BELIEVED, THEREFOR, THAT THE
<br />MOST LOGICAL PROCEDURE WOULD BE TO CONSIDER THAT THE CITY WOULD MAKE A CASH CONTRIBUTION
<br />TO THE UNITED STATES fOR THAT PORTION Or THE WORK. ON THE BASIS Of SUCH PROCEDURE THE
<br />CASH CONTRIBUTION BY THE CITY WOULD AMOUNT TO 865,900. THE REMAINING COST TO THE CITY,
<br />COMPRISED IN LANDS AND RIGHTS-Or-WAY AND RECONaTRUCTION OF BRIDGES AND UTILITIES, WOULD
<br />AMOUNT TO 154,200.
<br />
<br />SHOULD THE tlTY Of EUGENE BE AGREEABLE TO ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE LOCAL
<br />COOPERATION WITHIN THE €ITY AND THE DIVERSION CANAL TO FERN RIDGE RESERVOIR, AN EXPRESSION
<br />BY THE elTY COUNCIL TO THAT EfFECT WOULD fACILITATE PROCESSING Of THE REPORT BY THIS
<br />OfrlCE AS WELL AS HIGHER AUTHORITY. IT MAY BE FURTHER STATED THAT THOUGH ACTION or
<br />CONGRESS CANNOT BE PREDICTED DEFINITELV, YOU MAY BE ASSURED THAT CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT
<br />WOULD BE MUCH MORE CERTAIN SHOULD THE CUSTOMARY LOCAL REQUIREMENTS BE ASSUMED.
<br />
<br />I TRUST THE FOREGOING INFORMATION WILL BE SUrFICIENT rOR YOUR PRESENTATION TO THE
<br />CITY COUNCIL AT THIS TIME. THE COSTS MAY VARY SOMEWHAT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION
<br />DUE TO MORE DETAILED INFORMATION AND TO EITHER RISE OR OECLINE IN PRICE LEVELS. IF I
<br />MAY BE OF ASSISTANCE TO YOU IN THE rUTURE, 00 NOT HESITATE TO MAKE THE REQUEST.ft
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY HAWN THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND PLACED
<br />ON riLE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />,';-..;.,-
<br />
<br />.....~
<br />
<br />.,..~~;,.:~:;.-,,,-,:;';k'-....- """',~,:._":""'-c~):..s.'_':;"
<br />
<br />, _"~~~~~i."" :,:..-,:::.._,...;.;:_,,~,;,:,>,;-~
<br />
|