|
<br /> ~26~
<br /> j .- . -- -~-----"--"-,,-,,,,-~,,,"_..- "...-- ~- -..., --. .,--- --.. -- -..-.,. '.--- - . _...._ _'W~.~__ .' __.~"_ ... ..-'. -,-,., ~.~ ,.....- .. ._'. ., __,._~~.~,. .., u
<br /> ._-,-- ,.- ,..... .' "--., --- ,~_... .--- ._.. * - -. .~ .__..~- -. ~-,- .----.-. -..,'----
<br /> I -. -.-. . - .-. _.- '. ,- - - - -- I
<br /> 5. MR. J. A. PLUMMER WHO OWNS THE THREE ACRES SOUTH OF THE NEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL .ON I
<br /> HILYARD STREET HA S MADE CONT INUED REQUESTS TO HAVE THE C IT Y INSTALL A STORM SEWER ALONG
<br /> I ~ THE NOR T H BOUNDARY LINE OF THIS PROPERTY OR AS HE TERM S IT "PUT IT BACK IN A USABLE
<br /> I CONDITION. " l'IE HA VE INVESTIGATED THIS DRAINAGE SITUATION TWICE WITH THE Pu BL I C WORKS
<br /> [NGINEER. THE AMAZON I
<br /> , COMMITTEE AND THE CITY 0.1 TCH WAS CLEANED OUT TWO YEARS AGO WHEN THE
<br /> ,
<br /> il WAS DREDGED BUT THERE WAS NO DIRT OR SPOIL LE FT ON MR. PLUMMER'S PROPERTY. THE EASEMENT
<br /> :1 W H I CH MR. PLUMMER REFERS TO WAS DATED AUGUST 3 I , 1927 AND GIVES THE C IT Y THE RIGHT TO LAY
<br /> AN D CONSJRUCT AND MAINTAIN A S T 0 R~' S E WE R OVER SAID PROPERTY BUT DOES NOT SITPULATE THAT
<br /> I' THE C I T Y HAS TO MAINTAIN A STORM SEWER OVER SAID PROPERTY. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOL
<br /> II DISTRICT #4 WAS CONTACTED TO ASCERTAIN IF THE Y DESIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE INSTALL-AT I ON
<br /> II OF THIS STORM SEWER INASMUCH AS IT IS ON THE SOU T H LINE OF SCHOOL PROPERTY AND THEY DO NO T
<br /> FEEL IT IS NECESSARY AT THIS TIME. THE COMMITTEE DOES NOT FEEL T HA T THE CITY IF OBLIGATED
<br /> ;1 TO INSTALL THIS STORM S E WE R OR ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL WO RK UNDE R THE EASEMENT AS OUTLINED
<br /> II A BO V E . !
<br /> I
<br /> II 6. T A BULAT IONS FOR THE VARIABLE S PE E D SEWAGE PUMP TO BE INSTALLED IN THE 13TH AVEN,UE
<br /> i
<br /> 'I WEST PUMPING STATION WERE REVIEWED BY TI1E COMMITTEE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
<br /> li ,
<br /> II THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, IT IS RE COMMEN DE D THAT THE LOW BID OF R. H. BROWN BE ACCEPTED ,
<br /> OF I
<br /> AND THE PRO PE R AUTHORITIES ORDER THE PEERLESS PUMP AT A PRICE OF $1,118.40 AN D THE WESTING-
<br /> HOUSE MOTOR AT A PRICE OF $1,437.50 W HI CH IS A TOTAL BID OF 82,555.90, THIS BEING THE LOW
<br /> BID AS SUBMITTED BY THE FIVE BIDDERS UNDER DATE OF Ju L Y 20, 1950.
<br /> I II 7. IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE T HA T THE FOLLOWING THREE PROJECTS BE APPROVED AND
<br /> II T HA T ORDINANCES BE DRAWN AND THE CITY CA L L FOR BIDS FOR THIS WO RK THIS FALL, BIDS TO BE
<br /> 'I
<br /> :i OPENED AUGUST 25, 10:00 A.M.
<br /> I
<br /> ;1 ")(.. ( I ) PAVING THE ALLEY BETWEEN 20TH AND 21ST AVENUE FROM UNIVERSITY TO POTTER. (89.67%)
<br /> Ii
<br /> II (2 ) (PREVIOUSLY I
<br /> PAVING OF 20TH AVE NUE FROM WILLAMETTE TO OLIVE STREET AUTHORIZED BUT ,
<br /> I>
<br /> :1 NOT ABLE TO INCLUDE IN EARL Y BIDS)
<br /> ( 3) STORM SEWER BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH AVENUES FROM AGATE TO COLUMBIA STREET.
<br /> :1
<br /> il (4 ) STORM ROSE LANE FAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD "
<br /> II SEWER ON FROM EAST.
<br /> "
<br /> Ii
<br /> Ii IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY DA V I S THAT PARAGRAPH 6 - RE: VARIABLE SPEED SEWAGE PUMP
<br /> il BE ADOPTED. Ro L L C ALL VO T E . MOTION CAR R IE D.
<br /> II
<br /> Ii IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT OF THE Pu BL I C WORKS
<br /> II
<br /> il COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> 8 I, A REPORT OF THE JOINT PU BL I C SAFETY AND FINANCE COMMITTEES - RE: TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BONDS
<br /> II FO R FERRY STREET o;VERPASS, ETC. WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOL LOVlS:
<br /> I
<br /> 'I
<br /> I;
<br /> II itA MEETING OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND FINANCE COMMITTEES VIAS HELD T HU R S DAY NOON AUGUST 9,
<br /> :1 1950 WIT H THE FOLLOWING PRESENT; COUNCILMEN HAWN, DAVIS AND SM I T H; C IT Y MANAGER; C I T Y
<br /> I: RECORDER, AND CHI E F JONES.
<br /> ,
<br /> II THE CITY COUNCI L 21
<br /> I I I . PETITION PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED TO THE CONTAINING SIGNATURES FROM
<br /> :1 THE VICINITY 16TH MILL S T RE E T
<br /> .' OWNERS AND RENTERS IN OF" AND RE QUEST I NG STOP SIGNS AT T HIS
<br /> " AN
<br /> I INTERSECTION WAS REVIEWED. INVESTIGATION FROM THE TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT S 110WE 0 THA T DURING
<br /> THE FIRST SEVEN MONTHS OF THIS YEAR THREE ACCIDENTS HAV E BEEN REPORTED FROM THIS INTER-
<br /> SECTION, ALL WHICH WERE OF MINOR NATURE. IT WAS BROUGHT TO THE COMMITTEES' ATTENTION THAT
<br /> THIS WAS A MUCH LOWER RATE OF ACCIDENTS WH I C H HA VE OCCURRED AT THE CON TROLLE D INTERSECTIONS
<br /> II AND THAT IT WAS NOT CONSIDERED GOOD ENGINEERING POLICY TO PLACE S TO P SIGNS AT SU CH INTER-
<br /> SECTIONS AS IN MANY CASES ACCIDENTS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO INCREASE IN NUMBER AND SEVERITY
<br /> II AFTER THEIR INSTALLATION. UPON T HIS BASIS SUBMITTED BY THE TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY,
<br /> II IT WAS RECOMMEN DE 0 BY THE COMMITTEE THAT THE PETITION BE DENIED.
<br /> Ii
<br /> IJ 2. IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE THAT THE C IT Y EN'tER INTO
<br /> I, AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
<br /> L
<br /> :1 STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO REPLACE THE CORNER TRAFFI C LIGHTING SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTIONS
<br /> rl OF 6T H AN D WILLAMETTE, 7TH AND WI LLAMETTE, 6TH AND OLIVE AND 7TH AND CHARNEL TON WITH AN
<br /> 'i OVERHEAD SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH STATE HIGHVAY STANDARDS i
<br /> I, TO BE PAID FOR ON A FIFTY-FItTY
<br /> 'I
<br /> !I BASIS WITH THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AS THESE L I G HT S ARE ON HI G HW A Y 99, AND TO UTILIZE
<br /> 1I THE PRESENT CORNER TRAFFIC SIGNALS FROM T HE S E FOU R INTERSECTIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF
<br /> I' TRAFFIC LIGHTS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF 8TH AN 0 (J:A K, 10TH AN 0 OAK, I 3T H AND OLIVE AND 13TH
<br /> ,I AND (l'A K. THIS WILL PRACTICALLY COMPLETE TRAFFIC SI GNALS WITHIN.THE GRID SYSTEM, AN 0 FUNDS
<br /> 'I
<br /> II ARE AVAILABLE FOR THIS WORK IN THE 1950-51 BUDGET. FRANKLIN BOULEVARD TRAFFIC LIGHTING
<br /> $9,135.03 I
<br /> I' IN THE AMOUNT OF HAS BEEN PAID FOR AN D THE THREE TRAFFIC L I G HT S GOING IN AT 6TH
<br /> II AND HIGH, 7TH AND HIGH AND 7TH AND OLIVE ARE TO COS T APPROXIMATELY $4,000 FOR WHICH FUNDS
<br /> il HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE, LEAVI.NG AN AMOUNT OF $8,864.97 BUDGETED FOR THE A BOV E FOUR NEW INTER-
<br /> I SECTIONS.
<br /> I 3. oONNEV I LLE 1
<br /> I IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST OF THE POWER ADMINISTRATION FOR STAND-
<br /> I I
<br /> I BY FIRE PROTECTION FOR T HE I R NEW FIRE SUBST~TION AT lJOSHEN BE APPRO VE D UPON THE SAME BASIS
<br /> . I Ii AS o THE R OUTS I DE ESTABLISHMENTS. THIS WOULD MEAN T HA T THE BO~JNEVI LLE POVlER ADMINISTRATION
<br /> PAY 6-MILLS I
<br /> WOULD PER ANNUM ON THE ASSESSE 0 VALUATION OF THE SUBSTATION AS EST A BL ISH ED BY i
<br /> I THE COUNTY ASSESSOR AS THE COMMITTEE FELT T HA T IT WOULD NOT BE E QUI T A BL E FOR.THE CITY TO
<br /> ,I ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WHICH WOULD R E QU I RE THE TAX PA YERS OF THE CITY TO PA Y FOR THE COST
<br /> il OF FURNISHING AND MAINTAINING EQUIPMENT AND STAND-BY PROTECTION FOR OU T SID E EST A BL ISH MEN T S
<br /> L.. UNLESS THE Y PA Y THE REGULAR FEE AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED.
<br /> ;ri; ,... ~'-- "" .-~ ~ ..~ ~
<br /> . ~, -~_...... ~,~ . ""''' '.''''''~''"-'~---'-'- ",,--"-.-
<br />
|