|
<br />r514
<br /> -I:
<br /> NOW, THE8EFORE, I HEREBY PROCLAIM AND DECLARE THAT THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
<br /> CI TY OF EUGENE, OREGON', AND I HAVE DULY AND REGULARLY CANVASSED THE RETURNS AND
<br /> THERE WERE CAST FOR MEASURE No. 500-501 AFFIRMATIVE 630, NEGATIVE 446 AND 502-503 WITHIN
<br /> THE CITY OF EUGENE AFFIRMATIVE 705, NEGATIVE 31 I , WITHIN THE RIVER VIEW AND JUDKINS
<br /> ,VALLEY AREA, AFFIRMATIVE 92, NEGATIVE 153.
<br /> THAT I HAVE APPENDED HERETO AN ITEMIZED STATEMENT SHOWING THE VOTE BY WARDS, AND
<br /> ALSO A TOTAL SUMMARY.
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, I HEREBY PROCLAIM THAT MEASURE No. 500-501, AUTHORIZING PARKS AND
<br /> PLAYGROUNDS TAX LEVY OF ONE MILL FOR TEN YEARS HAS BEEN AFFIRMATIVELY CARRIED AT SAID
<br /> ELECTION, AND THAT MEASURE No. 502-503, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE R I, VER
<br /> VIEW-JUDKINS VALLEY AREA HAS BEEN DEFEATED AT SAID ELECTION BY REASON OF THE, VOTE IN
<br /> THE RIVER VIEW-JUDKINS VALLEY AREA.
<br /> .
<br /> ,DATED THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY, 1951. "
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY ALLEN, SECONDED BY.E?OO.T,tI,. T.f1~:r, H!,~. RECORDER AND MAYOR, BE AUT H 0 R I, ZED ,T 0
<br /> SIGN PROCLAMATION. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> \",
<br />20 RESOLUTION - RE: CLEAR LEGAL TITLE TO PROPERTY OF LOTTIEN. R~GH WAS SUBMITTED .AND
<br /> "
<br /> READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> ., I
<br /> "WHEREAS, A DISCREPANCY HAS ARISEN I N THE TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ABUTTING RAMEY
<br /> STREET IN THE CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON, BY REASON OF . THE FACT THAT ERRORS IN DESCRIPTION
<br /> - THE CITY OF EUGENE, - .
<br /> OCCURRED IN VACATION PROCEEDINGS CARRIED ON BY AND ,
<br /> WHEREAS, IT IS THE DESIRE OF THE.. CITY OF EUGENE AND THE OWNERS OF THE ABUTTING
<br /> PROPERTY, ,LOTTIE N. R~GH, TO CLEAR THE LEGAL TITLE TO SAID REAL PROPERTY AND TO
<br /> ESTABLISH THE STREET LINES ALONG RAMEY STREET AS THEY ARE NOW LOCATED, AND
<br /> WHEREAS, IT IS FOR THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AND THE ABUTTING
<br /> PROPERTY OWNERS TO CLEAR THE LEGAL TITLE TO SAID REAL PROPERTY"
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE C TY OF EUGENE MAKE, EXECUTE AND ,DEL I VER
<br /> A BARGAIN AND SALE DEED TO LOTTIE N. RUGH, CONVEYING ALL OF Tf:iE TITLE OF THE CITY OF
<br /> . .
<br /> EUGENE TO HER COVERING THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY, TO-WIT:
<br /> BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I , Bl_OCK I OF THE PLAT OF RUGH'S
<br /> SECOND ADDITION TO EUGENE, OREGON, AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN BOOK 8, PAGE
<br /> 24, LANE COUNTY OREGON RECORD OF PLATS, AND RUNNING THENCE WEST 155.74 FEET
<br /> TO THE EAST LINE OF RAMEY STREET AS NOW LAID OUT, SAID POINT BEING 17.0 FEET
<br /> WEST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK I OF SAID PLAT, AS ORIGINAL(.,Y
<br /> PLATTED; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RAMEY STREET.AS LAID OUT
<br /> 204.8 FEET; THENCE EAST 96.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 56. I FEET; THENCE EAST 97.09
<br /> FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF WI LLAME TTE STREE T; THE NCE NORTH 14008' WEST ALONG
<br /> THE WESTERLY LINE OF WILLAMETTE STREET 153.50 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING,
<br /> IN EUGENE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON. . ~ - ~ . - .
<br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE ,MA YOR AND CITY RECORDER OF THE CITY OF EUGENE I
<br /> EXECUTE SAID BARGAIN AND SALE DEED ON BEHALF OF THE CITti' OF EUGENE. "
<br /> IT W~S MpVED BY ALLENy BY BOOTH MOTION
<br /> SECONDED THAT THE RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED.
<br /> .,
<br /> CARI3IED.
<br /> UPON MOTION DULY MADE, ~~CONDED AND CARRIED, THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED TO JULY 23,
<br /> 1951.
<br /> NEW BUSINESS ~: ~, ...., ,- -.: -f , ' ~_ L
<br /> .,
<br /> I"
<br />21 COMMUNICATION FROM THE GA~EWAYS ASSOCIATIO~ - RE: STEWART VS J. H. KOKE AND THOMAS
<br /> I CHAPMAN.WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> "THE CASE OF ANENA M. STEWART VS J. H. KOKE AND -THOMAS I. CHAPMAN, AF'FECTING
<br /> THE RIGHT TO FILL IN THE MILLRACE IS NOW ON APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT OF' OREGON.
<br /> IN THE ORIGINAL HEARING BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE CI TY OF EUGENE WAS JOINED WITH
<br /> THE STEWARTS IN THE PETITION FOR AN INJUNCTION. MR. AND MRS. STEWART FEEL THAT THEY
<br /> CANNOT AFFORD THE EXPENSE OF THE APPEAL, AND THEY HAVE ASKED OUR ASSOCIATION TO LEND
<br /> A HAND BECAUSE THE CASE IS AS MUCH A PUBLIC.AS A PRIVATE MATTER.
<br /> ATTORNEY STANLEY DARLING HAS OFFERED TO DO MOST OF THE WORK OF PREPARING THE
<br /> APPEAj.., BUT OUR ASSOCIATION IS NOT FINANCIALLY PREPARED TO STAND THE COSTS WHICH
<br /> WOULD PROBABLY RUN AT LEAST $1500 FOR PRINTED BRIEFS AND OTHER NECESSARY CHARGES -
<br /> WITHOUT MAKING A SPECIAL SOLICITATION FOR FUNDS WHICH WE THINK SHOUI..D BE AVOIDED AT
<br /> THIS TIME.
<br /> I
<br />~
<br />
|