Laserfiche WebLink
types of security firms in operation in Eugene, an ordinance designed to address standards for police <br />uniforms would be a proactive measure. <br /> <br />The committee presented a draft proposal to the Police Commission in June 2004. It was emphasized <br />that, if enacted, the ordinance would be complaint driven, e.g., there would be no obligation by the City <br />to review uniforms to ensure that they are distinguishable from those worn by Eugene police officers. <br />The committee met with the City Attorney and from that discussion learned that the proposed ordinance <br />could not be lawfully applied to the University of Oregon's public safety officers. As a result of that <br />discussion, the commission discussed adopting specific standards describing a police uniform into the <br />city's administrative rules with a delayed effective date to allow a reasonable amount of time for <br />affected companies to come into compliance with the ordinance. <br /> <br />The draft ordinance, Attachment A, was presented to the Police Commission in November 2004. <br />Although the ordinance may only apply to private security firms, the commission believes that an <br />ordinance will have value in preventing uniform similarities from causing confusion to the general <br />public during interactions. Discussion continues with the Department of Public Safety at the University <br />of Oregon (UO-DPS) regarding uniform similarities between UO-DPS and the Eugene Police. <br /> <br />No financial or resource considerations are anticipated for the City of Eugene. In order to hold the <br />public hearing while students are still in school at the University of Oregon, the proposed ordinance will <br />be posted for public review prior to the council work session. <br /> <br />State Senator and Police Commissioner, Floyd Prozanski, has introduced SB547 at the 2005 Oregon <br />Legislative Session to amend ORS 162.367 to help to address some of the issues regarding police <br />uniforms (see Attachment B). This legislation would address criminal impersonation of a peace officer <br />and specifically states: <br /> "'Law enforcement uniform' means clothing bearing words such as 'police,' 'sheriff,' 'state <br /> trooper,' or 'law enforcement,' or clothing that is an official uniform or substantially similar to <br /> an official uniform of a law enforcement unit that would make it reasonably likely that a person <br /> would believe that the wearer is a peace officer." <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />During each legislative session, the council takes a position on all bills identified as important to the <br />City of Eugene. The council on April 21, 2005, took the position of Priority 2/support for SB547-A. <br /> <br />CO[INCIL OPTIONS <br />The council may choose to: <br />1. Proceed with the public hearing scheduled for May 23, 2005; <br />2. Make no changes to the Eugene Code concerning Police Uniform Standards; <br />3. Identify additional modifications to the draft ordinance that staff should address prior to a public <br /> hearing. <br /> <br />On May 4, 2004, the Police Commission task group held a forum to convey its concerns about <br />police uniform similarities, explain its proposed solution, and solicit feedback on the concept. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050511\S05051 iA. doc <br /> <br /> <br />