Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 1'9~ <br /> e <br /> '\ <br /> \, 2. THE COMMITTEE STUDIED THE 1952 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS PUBLISHED <br /> I Ii .BY THE PACIFIC COAST BUILDING OFFICIALS CONFERENCE. I TWAS NOTED THAT TITLE AND SCOPE <br /> II REMAIN THE SAME, AS WELL AS' ORGANI ZATION AND ENFORCEME~T, PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS. <br /> II THE REQUIREMENTS BASED ON OCCUPANCIES ARE THE SAME EXCEPT THA.T SOME OF THE OCCUPANCIES <br /> .I HAVE BEEN..BROKEN DOWN INTO SUBSECTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FIRE PROTECTION SEPARATION. <br /> \' THE TA.BLES FOR TYP.ES OF CONSTRUCTION HAVE BEEN REVISED FOR FIRE PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION. <br /> THE REQUIREMENTS BASED ON TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION REMAINS THE SAME AND THE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ~ Ii BASED ON LOCATIONS OF FIRE ZONES REMA.I N THE SA.ME. THE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS, REGU- <br /> if:) I LATIONS AND QUALITY OF DESIGN HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED. THE FIRE RESISTIVE STANDARDS FOR <br /> 00 II <br /> ~ ;1 FIRE PROTECTION ARE MORE CLEARLY DEFINED WITH ADDITIONAL TABLES GIVING THE FIRE VALUES <br /> ~ I OF VARIOUS TYPES .OF WALLS AND PETITIONS. AND COMBINATIONS OF MATERIAL. <br /> ~ 'I <br /> ~ <br /> I THE CHAPTER ON HEAT PRODUCING AppLIANCES HAS BEEN I NCREA.SED IN SCOPE TO INCLUDE <br /> Ii METHODS .OF I NSTALLATI ON, AIR SUPPLY FOR COMBUSTION WITH TABLES FOR CLEA~ANCES FOR <br /> 'I VARIOUS MATERIALS. DETAILS ON ROOM OR SPACE HEATERS .HAVE BEEN ENLARGED UPON INCLUDING <br /> ; : GAS HEATING, OIL AND SOLID .FUELS. THE SECTION ON COMMERCIAL FOOD PREPARATION EQUIPMENT <br /> II HAS BEEN ENLARGED UPON TO COVER THE TYPES OF APPLIANCES AND CLEARANCES, HOODS AND VENTS, <br /> ,I DISHWASHERS, STEA.M AND HOT FOOD TABLES. <br /> e I! <br /> I, T WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT THIS UNIFORM BUILDING CODE BASIS OF <br /> 11 WAS SET UP ON A FAIR <br /> Ii TRUE MERITS RELATIVE TO MATERIALS AND THEIR USE IN UNIFORMITY OF BUILDING CODES WHICH <br /> :1 OUTLINES MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY. VERSATILITY OF THE CODE IN RELATION TO <br /> i <br /> II DEV I AT I.ON I.S PROV IDEO FOR IN THE CODE AS LONG AS MATERIALS MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, <br /> AND VARIANCES MAY BE REVIEWED BY THE BOARD OF. ApPEALS. <br /> I! <br /> I I: THE CI,TY O~ EUGENE HAS BEEN OPERATING UNDER THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE <br /> 'I OF THE <br /> I( PACIFIC COAST SINCE 1936 AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL <br /> I ~ <br /> [I ADOPT THE NEW 1952 EDITION BYPASSING COUNCIL BILL No. 1371 WITH THE UNDERSTANDING <br /> 'I ORDINANCE #9509 " <br /> It . ~HA~ THE PRESEN~ FEES AS OUTLINED UNDER REMAIN THE SAME .. <br /> Ii <br /> r I TWAS .MOVED BY CR0MBAKER, SECONDED BY SIE~EN~HALER THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY <br /> " I <br /> I' COMM I TTEE BE ,ADOP.TED. Mo TI 0 N CAR R lED . . <br /> II I <br /> 6 A REPORT OF .THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE WAS HELD ON SEPTEMBER 4, I 952 WITH THE F 0 L L OW I N,G <br /> I' <br /> i' PRESENT: COUNCILMEN CRUMBAKER, GODLOVE, KOPPE .AND ~IEGENTHALER; CITY MANAGER AND CITY ENGI.NEER. <br /> " <br /> ,I <br /> I' <br /> II I . THE COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE REQUEST OF MRS. BLAI R .T. ALDERMAN TO USE. HER BUILDING AT <br /> I: 141-1/2 WEST 17TH ~AVENUE, FOR BUSINESS OR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES. I TWAS NOTED THAT THIS AREA <br /> .' <br /> . il WAS QU I.TE DENSELY OCCUPIED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES AND THAT NO BUSI NESS EXISTED I N::THE" <br /> I' <br /> I! I MMED I ATE AREA. IT IS I N THE R-2, Two FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. I TWAS RECOMMENDED I <br /> Ii THAT THIS BUILDING BE UTILIZED FOR R~SIDENTIAL PURPOSES FOR TWO OR POSSIBLY THREE A.PARTMENTS, I <br /> II <br /> ,I HOWEVER, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT IF THIS WA.S NOT POSSIBLE THAT MRS. ALDERMAN BRING A CONCRETE I <br /> II <br /> Ii PROPOSAL OF THE SPECIFIC USE DESIRED AT WHICH TIME I T WOULD BE REVIEWED FOR THAT PART I CULA.R <br /> PURPOSE. <br /> i <br /> I: 2. THE PROPOSAL OF MR. H. J. LEONARD TO EXCHANGE THE CORNER LOT AT 25TH AND HILYARD STREET, <br /> j! CONSTITUTING AN AREA OF 291 FEET BY 285 FEET FOR CITY OWNED PROPERTY WAS REVIEWED. IT WA.S <br /> Ii RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OFFER MR. LEONARD THE CITY OW NED LOT AT 6TH AND POLK <br /> II STREET FOR HIS .p R 0 PER T Y AT 25TH AND HILYARD, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CITY WOULD ASSUME <br /> I I! <br /> " HIS $2,600 ENCUMBRANCE AND THAT MR. LEONARD WOULD REMOVE ALL OF THE BUILDINGS EXCEPT THE <br /> f! <br /> :i CONCRETE BLOCK BUILDING ON THE SOUTH PART OF THE LOT. THIS PROPOSAL WAS SUGGESTED WITH THE <br /> I' THOUGHT THAT THE CITY COULD MUCH BETTER UTILIZE THIS PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOUTH <br /> ,: AMAZON DEVELOPMENT RATHER THAN THE LOAT A.T 6TH A.ND POLK STREET. <br /> i: <br /> I: . <br /> 3. IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - (A) PAVING OF MADISON STREET FROM 13TH AVENUE TO THE COUNTY <br /> I, <br /> I FAIRGROUNDS. THIS PETITION HAD ONLY ONE SIGNATURE, THAT OF REVEREND E. E. KROGSTAD, PA.STOR <br /> I OF THE ASSEMBLY OF- GOD CHURCH, CONSTITUTING 50% OR ALL OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET. IT <br /> , <br /> , <br /> e Ii WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE EAST SIDE BE CONTACTED IN CONNECTION WITH <br /> ii THE IMPROVEMENT OF THIS STREET. <br /> !I <br /> I, <br /> I, (B) IT WAS RECqMM~NDED T~AT THE PETITION REQUESTING THE PAV.I NG OF 23RD AVENUE BETWEEN <br /> !I <br /> WI LLAMETTE AND PEARL STREET CONSTITUTING 65.28% OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS BE APPROVED FOR <br /> CONSTRUCTION IN 1953. <br /> Ii ( C ) IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION REQUESTING A SANITARY SEWER IN THE ALLEY BETWEEN <br /> . . <br /> ,I MI LL AND FERRY STREET FROM 12TH TO 13TH AVENUE, CONSTITUTING 53~~8% OF THE PROPERTY AFFECTED <br /> I ~ BE APPROVED. I TWAS SUGGE.STED THAT PROPE~TIES AFFECTED BYT~IS SEWER BE CHECKED RELATIVE TO <br /> II <br /> I, PREVIOUS ASSESSMENTS AND ALSO WHICH PROPERTIES WOULD BE BENEFITTED. <br /> I <br /> II 4. THE CITY MANAGER DISCUSSED THE PRESENT SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM UNDERWAY BRINGING OUT <br /> Ii THE FACT THAT I N SOME CASES THERE ARE CURB REPAIRS INVOLVED. ITWAS RECOMMENDED BY THE <br /> II COMMITTEE THAT INASMUCH AS THE CITY'S POLICY HAD BEEN TO MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENTLY IMPROVED <br /> I: STREETS WITHIN THE CITY WHICH WOULD INCLUDE CURBS AND GUTTERS, THAT CURBS REPAIRED UNDER <br /> I ii THIS SIDEWALK PROGRAM BE PAID FOR BY THE CITY. I TWAS BROUGHT OU.T, HOWEVER THAT TH I.S WOULD <br /> I <br /> NOT INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF NEW CURBS OR THE INSTALLATION OF CURBS OVER ABANDONED DRIVE- I <br /> , <br /> I: WAYS. IT WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY MANAGER STUDY ALL PRESENT CURB CUTS IN THE CITY I <br /> I: TO ASCERTAIN THOSE WHICH HAVE BEEN ABANDONED OR ARE NOT NEEDED AND TO HAVE PROPER CURBS <br /> I' <br /> II INSTALLED WHEREVER THESE DRIVEWAYS OR CURB CUTS ARE NEEDED AND TO HAVE PROPER CURBSCINSTALLED <br /> " <br /> I, WHEREVER THESE DRIVEWAYS OR CURB CUTS ARE NOT NEEDED TO FACILITATE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES <br /> II <br /> I THROUGHOUT THE BUSINESS DISTRICT. <br /> " <br /> I' <br /> Ii <br /> e ,i <br /> Ii I <br /> I <br /> I: I <br /> :1 <br /> :1 I <br /> i ~ <br /> =----- ~ ~ <br />