|
<br />r218
<br /> e
<br /> --
<br /> I TWAS MOVED BY GRUMBAKER, S(C 0 NDE 0 BY BOOTH THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNI NG I
<br /> COMMISSION REGARDI N~ REZON1NG OF THE R. B. JOHNSON PROPERTY BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> IT WA.S BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY BOOTH REPORT P~RTAINING I:
<br /> MOVED THA T THE PORTION OF THE
<br /> TO ELAIN GETTY - MARTHA SELANDER BE RECEIVED AND THAT A HEARING BE RE-ADVERTISED FOR OCTOBER II
<br /> 27, 1952. MOTION CARRIED. -,
<br /> I TWAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY SMITH THAT THE RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT ON THE II
<br /> WA.RE, BOYD, BINTZ PROPERTY BE INDEFINI TELY 'POS TPONED AND THAT THE MA. TTER BE REFERRED TO THE Ii
<br /> PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC SAFE!Y COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL. SI EG~NTHALER VOTED NO. MOTION II
<br /> I CARRIED. Ii
<br /> I -
<br /> I IN THE REPORT ON REQUEST OF STENWICK & KOK, I T WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY BOOTH I'
<br /> THAT THE REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE ADOPTED AND THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE
<br /> PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMI TTEES TO CONSIDER FOR A VARIANCE. MOTION CA.RRI ED. I
<br /> I
<br /> I TWAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE PORTION OF THE REPORT RELATIVE TO I
<br /> I F. K. BREWER BE RECEIVED A.ND THAT THE REQUEST BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC I e
<br /> I SAFETY COMMI TTEES FOR STUDY AND REPORT. MOTION CARRI ED. I
<br /> I TWAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE REPORT ON THE REQUEST O~ RALPH B.
<br /> I
<br /> LAKE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. Ii
<br /> IT WA.S MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, BY BOOTH PLANNING
<br /> SECONDED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE I'
<br /> COMMISSION RELATIVE TO ZONING OF THE NEWLY ANNEXED SUNNY HOLLOW AREA IN WHICH THE AREA WOULD Ii I
<br /> BE CLASSIFIED AS RA OUTER RESIDENTIAL BE A.DOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. . ' . II
<br /> PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS Ii
<br />8 THE FOLLOWING AP~LICA~IONS FOR BEER LICENSES, AS APPROVED BY THE POLICE DEPARTME NT, WERE Ii
<br /> SUBMI 'nED: II
<br /> KAUFFMAN'S GROCERY, I 123 MONROE CECIL E. QUINN. II
<br /> - I'
<br /> CHUCK'S KORNER, 101 W. 7TH - HARRY RUTH AND ANN V. RUTH. :1
<br /> I TWAS MOVED B Y S I E C;;E NTH ALE R , SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE APPLICATIONS, AS APPROVED, BE ii
<br /> ENDORSED. MOTION CARRIED. ,
<br /> I
<br /> I '.
<br />9 AN APPLICATION FOR A ROOMI NG HOUSE LICENSE WAS SUBMITTED BY SOL ROSENBERG FOR THE ST. I
<br /> I
<br /> FRANCIS HOTEL, 182 W. 8TH AVENUE. THIS APPLICATION WAS APPROVED BY THE POLICE, FIRE, BUILDING
<br /> AND HEALTH DEPARTMENTS.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE APPLI CA.TI ON, AS APPROVED, BE
<br /> ENDORSED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />10 AN A,PPLICATION FOR A THEATER LICENSE FOR THE MACDoNALD AND REX THEATERS, AS APPROVED BY I
<br /> POLitE DEPARTMENT, I
<br /> THE WA.S SUBM I TTED. I'
<br /> I "
<br /> II
<br /> I IT WAS .MOVED BY BOOTH, APPLICATION AS POLICE I,
<br /> SECONDED BY SMITH THAT THE APPROVED BY THE ,I
<br /> I' I
<br /> , !I
<br /> DEPARTMENT BE ENDORSED. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> PETITION - RE: COMPLAINT ON OLD AVENUE I!
<br />I I HOUSE I N THE ALLEY BETWEEN 16TH A.ND. 17TH AND II
<br /> FERRY STREET WAS I'
<br /> SUBMITTED, ADVISING THAT IT IS A NUl SAhKE~AND FIRE HAZARD. ,I
<br /> !i
<br /> SECONDED PUBLIC :'
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY.CRUMBAKER, BY BOOTH THAT THE PETITION BE REFERRED TO THE Ii
<br /> SAFETY AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEES. MOTl ON CARRI ED. "
<br /> I:
<br />12 COMMUNICATION FROM MRS. EVA E. BRUNSON - RE: R.EQUEST FOR REZONING OR VARIANCE AT 372 il e
<br /> WEST BROADWAY WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I
<br /> "I SHOULD LIKE TO USE MY PROPERTY AT 372 WEST BROADWAY FOR A BEAUTY SALON AND
<br /> RETAIL COSMETICS STORE AND FOR APARTMENTS. AT PRESENT THE PROPERTY IS IN CLASSIFICATION
<br /> R-3. HEREWI TH IS MY FORMAL APPLICATION THAT THE CL~SSIFICATION BE CHANGED TO C-3.
<br /> HOWEVER, I N V I EW OF THE FACT THAT THE NEXT CONSIDERATION OF THESE PETITIONS WILL BE "
<br /> 'I
<br /> DELA,YED UNTIL NEXT JANUARY, I AM RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THAT THE COUNCIL GRANT A VARIANCE, II
<br /> I,
<br /> PENDING DECISION .ON MY PETI TION FOR REZONI NG, UNDER THE PROVI SI ONS OF ORD I NA.NCE No. 9188 il
<br /> "
<br /> A. NO ON THE BASIS OF THESE FACTS. !i
<br /> THE . [I
<br /> I . EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES IN THIS CASE ARE THAT MY PROPERTY IS BUT ONE'LOT II
<br /> REMOVED F~OM PROPERTY NOW CLASSIFIED C-3 AND, AS IS WELL KNOWN, THE MOVEMENT OF BUSINESS Ii
<br /> HA.S BEEN TOWARD MY PROPERTY. ALSO, BECAUSE OF INJURIES CAUSING BAD HEALTH I CA,N NO LONGER il
<br /> OPERA.TE THIS PROPERTY ENTIRELY AS A ROOMING HOUSE A.ND MAY HAVE TO SELL MY INTEREST AT A :j
<br /> LARGE LOSS UNLESS I CAN OBTA.I N THE C-3 CLASSIFICATION. Ii I
<br /> II
<br /> [I
<br /> 2. ALLOWANCE OF THIS VARIANCE IS NECESSA.RY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF MY ,I
<br /> PROPERTY FOR THE REASON JUST GIVEN AND BECAUSE 'WHE N I BOUGHT TIjE PROPERTY I WAS GIVEN TO II
<br /> 'I
<br /> UNDERSTAND THA.T I TWAS CLASSIFIED C-3. II
<br /> :1
<br /> 3. GRA,NTING THE VARIANCE WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC CONVENI ENCE NOR BE DETRIMENTAL Ii
<br /> TO OTHER Ol,/NERS IN THE VICINITY BECAUSE THE IMMEDIATE AREA IS PRACTICALLY IN THE C-3
<br /> SECT' ON R \ GHT NOW A.ND THE MOVEMENT OF BUSINESS WEST HAS BEEN OBSERVED FOR A LONG TI ME. ii e
<br /> FURTHERMORE, ATTACHED IS A STATEMENT SIGNED BY MY NEIGHBORS SAYING THAT THEY HAVE II
<br /> NO
<br /> OBJECTION TO THE CHANGE. " I
<br />~ r:
<br />
|