Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~'54 <br /> e <br /> -- <br /> I T WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT THE SEWAGE TREATMENT' PLANT I S BEl NG PAl D FOR, BY T~E WATER I <br /> SERVICE CHARGES 'AND THAT UNDER THE PRESENT SYSTEM Of RATES THE UNIVERSITY WAS NOT PAYING <br /> AN EQUITABLE SHARE. THI S CONFIRMS THE PREVI,OUSREQUEST THAT THE UNI.vERSI TYWOUL,D ,PAY AN <br /> ADDITIONAL AMOUNT FOR THE ENLARGED CAPACITIES Of THE OUTFALL LINES A~D SEWAGE TREATMENT <br /> PLANT TO ACCOMMODATE FUTURE EST'I,MATED ENROLLMENT OF", THE UNI VERSI TY. <br /> IT WAS GENERALLY AGREEDiHAT THE UNIVERSITY SHOULD PAY THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE I <br /> OF THE-SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT AND THAT A PROPER SUM SHOULD BE FIGURED I , <br /> BASED UPON THE GENERAL ,COSTS OF ~HETRUNK SEWER SYSTEM AND TREATMEN~ FAC1LITIES. .,UNIV~R- I <br /> I, <br /> I, <br /> SITY OFFICIALS AGREED IN PR1NCIPLE THAT THE UNIVERSITY SHOULD PAY THEIR fAIR SHARE OF THE II <br /> TRUNK LINE SEWER SYSTtM SERVING THE UNIVERSITY, AS WELL AS THEIR PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF ,I <br /> ;1 <br /> THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND OUTfALL LINE, PROVIDED AN EQUITABLE BASIS COULD BE ARRIVED !, <br /> AT IN DETERMINING THIS-SHARE. il <br /> IT WAS R~COMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE THAT A THOROUGH STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF THE PRESENT " <br /> Ii <br /> WATER SERVICE CHARGES BE MADE TO SEE IF ANY ADJUSTMENTS SHOULD BE MADE RELATIVE TO " <br /> i; <br /> COMMERCIAL OR NON-DOMESHC USES." i' <br /> II e <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY ALLEN THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED BACK TO THE il <br /> Ii <br /> " <br /> PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FOR F'URTHER STUDY. MOTION CARR I EO'. " <br /> II <br />5 ~ REPORT Of THE PuBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE - RE: REQUESTS Of DE Loss CROOK; CITY TRANSIT i ~ <br /> 'I <br /> LINES; VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I, <br /> :i <br /> "A MEETING or THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE WAS HELD ON DECEMBER 5, 195? WI TH T~E II <br /> !I I <br /> " <br /> fOLLOWING PRESENT: MAYOR JOHNSON; COUNCILMEN KOPPE AND SIEGENTHALER; CITY MANAGER; CITY 11 <br /> ENGINEER-AND CITY RECORDER. II <br /> 'I <br /> II <br /> 'I <br /> I . THE REQUEST OF' MR. DELoss CROOK FOR' A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF' A I, <br /> SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON THE PROPERTY ,AT 3031 WILLAMETTE STREET WAS REVIEWED. THERE IS AT II <br /> PRESENT A .6 BY 18 fOOT SMALL HOME ON THE REAR OF' THIS LOT. MR. CROOK REQUESTS PERMISSION I, <br /> 'I <br /> TO CONSTRUCT ANOTHER HOUSE 36 BY 24 FEET ON THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY. HIS PLAT SHOWS A II <br /> SETBACK LINE OF 37 FEET FROM THE FRONT WITH PROPER SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACKS PROVIDED. :1 <br /> Ii <br /> IT WAS fELT THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS HOUSE WOULD IMPROVE THE LOT. ADJACENT /,1 <br /> PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE STATED THEY HAD NO OBJECTIONS. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCIL I: <br /> I <br /> GRANT THIS VARIANCE. :! <br /> , <br /> 2. THE PROPOSAL Of THE CITY TRANSIT LINES FOR RE-ROUTING OF BUS LINES IN THE CITY OF it -. <br /> EUGENE WAS REVIEWED AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THESE ROUTES BE CHANGED AS REQUESTED II <br /> PROVIDED NOTHING OF' A DETRIMENTAL NATURE RESULTING FROM THESE CHANGES WAS PRESErNa~D AT I! <br /> " <br /> THE HEARING SET FOR COUNCtL~DECEMBER 8, " <br /> 1952. I' <br /> II <br /> 3. ~FTER VIEWING THE VACATION OF' FOUR PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS IN THE WILLIS HEIGHTS Ii <br /> ADDITION, ,I <br /> IT WAS NOTED THAT PRESENT ALLEYS AND STREETS SUF'FICIENTLY ACCOMMODATED ALL " <br /> !1 <br /> UTILITIES AND THESE FOUR EASEMENTS WERE NO LONGER NEEDED. IT WAS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED 11 <br /> THE COUNCIL APPROVE VACATION PROCEEDINGS." I; <br /> 'I <br /> IT WAS MOVED BYCRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY ALLEN THAT ITEM No. 2 OF THE REPORT BE II I <br /> REFERRED BACK TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT OF' THE PUBLIC " <br /> , <br /> " <br /> WORKS COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. i <br /> I REPORTS ,Of BOARDS ~NDCOMMISSIONS <br /> I <br /> I <br />6 A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS - RE: REQUESTS OF MODE ART COMPANY; rROMAN CHAMBE'RS; <br /> W. L. Huss AND CHARLES A. BONNETT WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> "THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETING DECEMBER 4, 1952 AT THE CITY HALL TO CONSIDER e <br /> THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES O~ SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. MEMBERS PRESENT WERE MR. <br /> LUVAAS, MR. GILLILAN, MR. MORRIS,~ND MR. VAALER. <br /> I . THE MODE ART COMPANY OF' 2003 rRANKLIN BOULEVARD PLANS A 14 FOOT BY 35 FOOT ADDITION <br /> TO THEIR EXISTING BUI~DING AND REQUEST THE WAIVER OF THE 25 FOOT SETBACK TO PERMIT KEEPING <br /> THE ADDITION IN LINE WITH RRONT or EXISTING BUILDING. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT WOULD CON- <br /> SIST OF' rlLLING IN AN AREA AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF' THE BUILDING AND WOULD MEET THE <br /> SAME LINES AS THE EXISTING BUILDING. THIS WOULD MAINTAIN A SIX F'OOT THREE INCH SETBACK. <br /> EXISTING BUILDING TO THE EAST AND WEST ARE MAINTAINING A THREE F'OOT SETBACK. <br /> THE BOARD IN ITS DELIBERATIONS FELT THE REQUEST WAS REASONABLE AND IN KEEPING WITH <br /> THE REST Or THE BUILDING F'RONT LINE, THEREFORE GRANTED THE WAIVER. <br /> I 2. MR.,' PETERS WHO OWNS RESI DENTIAL PROPERTY AT 2790 BAKER STREET REQUESTS A Will VER OF <br /> I <br /> I THE 20 FOOT SETBACK REQU I.RED F'OR GARAGES' I N ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A CARPORT TO THE FRONT I <br /> OF' IiIIS HOUSE. <br /> SINCE MR. PETERS DID ~OT SUPPLY SUF'FICIENT INF'ORMATION AND THE BOARD DESIRES, TO MAKE <br /> A fiELD I'NSPECTlON BErORE RENDERING A DECISION,c THE REQUEST WAS TABLED. <br /> 1 <br /> , e <br /> i <br />~ I <br /> ,I <br /> , <br /> -' <br />