|
<br /> 447~
<br />e
<br /> ji r
<br /> ,
<br /> I
<br /> , REPORTS OF COMMITTEES I
<br />I I
<br /> 6 A COMBINATION MEETING OF THE COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION - RE: ZONING CHANGES WAS
<br /> SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> ,
<br /> I "A COMBINATION MEETI NG OF THE COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION WAS HELD ON
<br /> :' AUGUST 3, COUNC~L~EN CR0MBAKER,
<br /> 'I 1953 WITH THE FOLLOWING PRESENT: MAYOR JOHNSON;
<br />~ 'I BOOTH, GODLOVE, KOPPE, SIEGENTHALER, WATSON, CONE AND OWEN; . PLANNING COM~ISSION -
<br />tQ ;1
<br />(tJ I ELDON JOHNSON, PRESI DENT; AND MEMBERS UREY, BURRIS, FOSTER AND MACKINNON; AND
<br /><( Ii PLANNING CONSULTANT; CITY MANAGER; CI TV ATTORNEY; CITY RECORDER AND NEWLY APPOINTED
<br />~ :1 CITY MANAGER ROBERT A. FINLAYSON; TOM JAQUES, REGI STER-GUARD. I
<br />~ "
<br /> II
<br /> I THIS MEETING WAS HELD FOR THE, PUR POSE OF STUDYING THE ADOPTION OF TWO NEW
<br /> ['
<br /> ,\ SECTIONS IN THE ZON1,NG ORDI NANCE AND A MEANS OF CLARIFYING THE ISSUANCE OF VARIANCES
<br /> II AND CONDITIONAL USES. THIS ENTIRE STUDY IS SEGREGATED AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> II I
<br /> It I . COUNCIL BILL No. 1583, GIVEN FIRST READING ON JULY 13, 1953 -- ADDING SECTION
<br /> ,! XII-I,,;C-3P TO ZONING ORDINANCE. I TWAS NOTED THAT, THI S CATEGORY WOULD I NCLUDE, ALL
<br />e Ii OF THE PROVISIONS IN C-3 AND THE ONLY CHANGE WOULD BE A RAT! 0 OF PARKING FOR EACH
<br /> SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR SPACE. AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSS ION, IT SEEMED TO BE THE
<br /> II
<br /> i: CONSENSUS OF OPINION BY THE MAJORITY THAT ONE-FOURTH SQUARE FOOT PARK liNG FOR EACH
<br /> II FOOT OF FLOOR SPACE WOULD BE THE MOST EQUITABLE RATIO TO SET UP. I TWAS BROUGHT
<br /> "
<br /> OUT THAT A HIGHER RATIO OF PARKING MIGHT TEND TO DISCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
<br /> BUSINESS AREA IN QUESTlON. IT WAS AGREED HOWEVER; THAT SOME RATIO FO~ PARKING
<br />I SHOULD BE SET UP AS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE PARKING IN
<br /> NEWLY DEVELOPED BUSINESS AREA. No DEFI NI TE RECOMMENDATION WAS MADE PENDING FURTHER I
<br /> STUDY.
<br /> I 2. COUNCIL BILL No. 1584, GIVEN FIRST READING ON JULY 13, 1953 - ADDING SECTION
<br /> I X-I CR-COMMERCIAL.TO ZONING ORDINANCE. IN SETTING UP THIS ZONING CLASSIFICATION,
<br /> THE OBJECTIVES ARE TO PROVIDE A COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL AREA WHEREIN CERTAIN USES
<br /> SUCH AS BANKS, PROFESSIONAL OFFICES, MEDICAL OR DENTAL OFFICES, CLUBS, LODGES! ETC.
<br /> MAY BE PERMITTED IN WHAT IS COMMONLY CAllED THE "TWILIGHT ZONE" AREA 'MMEDI ATELY
<br /> ADJACENT TO THE BUSINESS SECTION. THESE SO-CALLED "TWI L1 GHT ZONES" ARE AREAS WHICH
<br /> ARE POTENTIAL BUSINESS SECTIONS AND DURING THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD THE ABOVE CLASSIFI-
<br /> CATIONS WOULD BE PERMI TTED I N AN ENDEAVOR TO EFFECT A BETTER AND MORE COMPLETE USE OF
<br /> THE PROPERTY DURING THE TIME OF THE CHANGE BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS. IT WA,S
<br /> GENERALLY AGREED THAT THIS CLASSIFICATION WOULD BE VERY BENEFICIAL IN COPING WITH THE
<br />'.. PRESENT REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH USES. No RECOMMENDATION WAS
<br /> MADE PENDING FURTHER STUDY.,
<br /> 3. COUNCIL BilL No. 1585 -'GIvEN FIRST READING ON JULY I 3, 1953 -- REZONING LINCOLN
<br /> AND LAWRENCE FROM THE ALLEY BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH TO 13TH' TO C-R,,- IT WAS GENERALLY
<br /> AGREED THAT THIS ZONING WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THIS AREA TO PERMIT THESE ADDITIONAL
<br /> USES FOR A HIGHER AND BETTER USE OF THE EXISTING PROPERTY. No SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
<br /> WERE MADE PENDING FURTHER STUDY.
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> II 4. COUNCIL BILL No. 1586 - GIVEN ~IRST READING ON JULY 13, 1953 -- REZONING OAK -
<br /> ,I
<br /> 'I PEARL HIGH 13TH TO C-3P COMMERCIAL. THE COMMITTEE
<br />I (I - BETWEEN I I TH AND CONSIDERED THE
<br /> REZONING OF THE REMAINING A~EA NOT NOW IN C-3 BETWEEN OAK AND THE ALLEY BETWEEN HIGH
<br /> "
<br /> ,I AND MILL TO C3-P. THIS WOULD HAVE ITS NORTH BOUNDARY ON THE ALLEY BETWEEN I I TH AND
<br /> I' 12TH AVENUE SOUTH BOUNDARY ON THE 13TH AND 14TH AVENUE. IT WAS
<br /> Ii AND ALLEY BETWEEN
<br /> 'I BROUGHT OUT THAT THIS AREA WAS RAPIDLY BECOMING BUSINESS AND THAT THIS ZONING WOULD
<br /> II SQUARE UP T~IS SECTION FOR THE BEST AND HIGHEST USES POSSIBLE. No RECOMMENDATIONS
<br /> ':1 WERE MADE PENDING FURTHER STUDY.
<br /> I,
<br /> 'I 5. THE AREA BETWEEN 13TH AND 19TH FROM WILLAMETTE TO HIGH STREET WAS THOROUGHLY
<br />e I STUDIED WITH THE THOUGHT OF REZONING THIS TO EITHER C-3P OR CR, COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL.
<br /> I
<br /> I! ALTHOUGH THERE WERE SOME DIFFERENCES OF OPINION AS TO WHETHER THIS AREA WAS READY FOR
<br /> A HIGHER TYPE ZONING AT THIS TIME, IT SEEMED TO BE GENERALLY AGREED THAT IT MIGHT BE
<br /> :1 BENEFICIAL TO ZONE THE AREA' BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE ALLEY BETWEEN 13TH AND 14TH,
<br /> I, ON THE SOUTH BY 18TH AVENUF; AND ON THE EAST BY THE ALLEY BETWEEN PEARL AND HIGH
<br /> :1 STREE T TO C-3PAND PROVIDING A BU~FER ZONE AROUND THIS AREA BY ZONING THE HALF BLOCK
<br /> " ADJACENT AND WEST OF HIGH STREET AND BETWEEN 18TH ,AVENUE AND THE HALF BLOCK BETWEEN
<br /> il 18TH AND THE ALLEY BETWEEN 16TH AND 19TH TO CR, COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL. I TWAS FEL T
<br /> THAT THE HANDLING OF THIS AREA IN THIS MANNER WOULD PROVIDE MORE AREA FOR BUSINESS
<br /> I,
<br /> 'i DEVELOPMENT AND AFFORD BETTER USE OF THE PROPERTY AND THAT THE BUFFER ZONE WOULD
<br /> I; SCHOOL DISTRI,CT I
<br /> ,I ELIMINATE THE OBJECTIONS PREVIOUSLY .SUBMITTED BY THE IN CONNEC T LON
<br /> "
<br /> " WITH BUSINESS ZONING IN THI S AREA,. No RECOMMENDATIONS WERE MADE PENDING FURTHER STUDY.
<br /> il I
<br /> \'1 1588 - GIVEN FIRST READING ON JULY
<br /> ! 6. COUNCIL BilL No. 27, 1953 - VARIANCES AND
<br /> "
<br /> I; CONDITIONAL USES. CONSIDERABLE TIME WAS SPENT I N THE STUDY OF THE PRESENT MEANS OF
<br />I :1 GRANTING VARIANCES IN CONNECTIO~ WITH ffiHE LEGALITY OF SUCH PROCEDURES AND THE STUDY OF
<br /> Ii IT
<br /> I' GENERAL ~EQUIREMENTS FOR VARIANCES FROM RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE USE OF .PROPER TY.
<br /> ,I 0
<br /> WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT THIS NEW ORDINANCE WOULD PERMIT THE CITY COUNCIL TO GRANT SUCH
<br /> II VARIANCES IF, THE PART! CUlAR VARIANCE WOULD MEET ANY ONE OF THE' FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS
<br /> I) AND IF IT WOULD NOT BE CONTRARY TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING PLAN.
<br /> )1
<br />e 11
<br /> :1
<br /> II
<br /> i!
<br /> II
<br /> !'
<br /> ....1
<br /> -
<br />
|